AlfassiM. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309–332. doi:10.3102/00028312035002309
2.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BoardmanA. G.VaughnS.BuckleyP.ReutebuchC.RobertsG.KlingnerJ. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82, 409–427. doi:10.1177/0014402915625067
4.
DermitzakiI.AndreouG.ParaskevaV. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achievers’ strategic behaviors and their relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology, 29, 471–492. doi:10.1080/02702710802168519
5.
Faggella-LubyM. N.GranerP. S.DeshlerD. D.DrewS. V. (2012). Building a house on sand: Why disciplinary literacy is not sufficient to replace general strategies for adolescent learners who struggle. Topics in Language Disorders, 32, 69–84. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318245618e
6.
FlavellJ. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In BeilinH.PufallP. (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 107–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206. doi:10.3102/00028312034001174
8.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
JenkinsJ. R.AntilL. R.WayneS. K.VadasyP. F. (2003). How cooperative learning works for special education and remedial students. Exceptional Children, 69, 279–292. doi:10.1177/001440290306900302
11.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
KentS.WanzekJ.SwansonE. A.VaughnS. (2015). Team-based learning for students with high-incidence disabilities in high school social studies classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 3–14. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12048
13.
KintschW. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Oxford, England: Erlbaum.
14.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.ArguellesM. E.HughesM. T.LeftwichS. A. (2004). Collaborative Strategic Reading “real-world” lessons from classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 291–302. doi:10.1177/07419325040250050301
15.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.BoardmanA. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.SchummJ. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–22. doi:10.1086/461914
18.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.BlakeR. G. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
19.
The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. (2009). CSR strategies. Austin, TX: Author.
20.
The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. (2013a). PACT U.S. history lessons. Austin, TX: Author.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2014). The nation’s report card: Reading 2014. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2015). The nation’s report card: Reading 2015. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
25.
O’ConnorR. E.JenkinsJ. R. (1996). Cooperative learning as an inclusion strategy: A closer look. Exceptionality, 6, 29–51. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0601_3
26.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
27.
ParisS. G.ParisA. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
28.
PearsonP. D.GallagherM. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
29.
PérezB. (Ed.). (2004). Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
PressleyM. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In FarstrupA.SamuelsS. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading.
31.
PressleyM.HildenK. (2006). Cognitive strategies. In DamonW.LernerR.KuhnD.SieglerR. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 511–556). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
SwansonE. A.WanzekJ.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA. M. (2015). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge among middle school students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 426–442. doi:10.1177/0014402914563704
35.
SwansonE. A.WexlerJ.VaughnS. (2009). Text reading and students with learning disabilities. In. HiebertE. (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 210–230). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
SymonsS.SnyderB. L.Cariglia-BullT.PressleyM. (1989). Why be optimistic about cognitive strategy instruction? In McCormickC.MillerG.PressleyM. (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Springer.
37.
VaughnS.KlingnerJ. K.SwansonE. A.BoardmanA. G.RobertsG.MohammedS. S.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2011). Efficacy of collaborative strategic reading with middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 938–964. doi:10.3102/0002831211410305
38.
VaughnS.MartinezL. R.WanzekJ.RobertsG.SwansonE. A.FallA. M. (2016). Improving content knowledge and comprehension for English language learners: Findings from a randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 22–34. doi:10.1037/edu0000069
39.
VaughnS.RobertsG.SwansonE. A.WanzekJ.FallA. M.Stillman-SpisakS. J. (2015). Improving middle-school students’ knowledge and comprehension in social studies: A replication. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 31–50. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9274-2
40.
VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.WanzekJ.Stillman-SpisakS. J.SolisM.SimmonsD. (2013). Improving reading comprehension and social studies knowledge in middle school. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 77–93. doi:10.1002/rrq.039
41.
WanzekJ.KentS. C.VaughnS.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.HaynesM. (2015). Implementing team-based learning in middle school social studies classes. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 331–344. doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.893224
42.
WanzekJ.SwansonE.VaughnS.RobertsG.FallA. M. (2016). English learner and non-English learner students with disabilities: Content acquisition and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 82, 428–442. doi:10.1177/0014402915619419
43.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.KentS. C.SwansonE. A.RobertsG.HaynesM.. . . SolisM. (2014). The effects of team-based learning on social studies knowledge acquisition in high school. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 183–204. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.836765
44.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices (NCEE 2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/adlit_pg_082608.pdf
45.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide/14