BeckerA.McLaughlinT.WeberK. P.GowerJ. (2009). The effects of copy, cover and compare with and without additional error drill on multiplication fact fluency and accuracy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7, 747–760.
2.
BerkeleyS.RiccominiP. J. (2017). Academic progress monitoring. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (3rd ed., pp. 334–347). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BordersC. M.BockS. J.SzymanskiC. (2015). Teacher ratings of evidence-based practices from the field of autism. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20, 91–100. doi:10.1093/deafed/enu033
4.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR.ScammaccaN.ChavezM. M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20–32. doi:10.1177/0741932507309712
5.
BurnsM. K. (2005). Using incremental rehearsal to increase fluency of single-digit multiplication facts with children identified as learning disabled in mathematics computation. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 237–249.
6.
BurnsM. K.KaniveR.DeGrandeM. (2010). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932510381652
7.
BurnsM. K.YsseldykeJ. E. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11. doi:10.1177/0022466908315563
8.
CampuzanoL.DynarskiM.AgodiniR.RallK. (2009). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from two student cohorts (NCEE 2009-4041). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
9.
CarrM.TaasoobshiraziG.StroudR.RoyerJ. M. (2011). Combined fluency and cognitive strategies instruction improves mathematics achievement in early elementary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 323–333. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.04.002
10.
CawleyJ. F.ParmarJ.FoleyR.SalmonT. E.SharmilaS.SharmilaR. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 1–18. doi:10.1177/001440290106700302
11.
CoddingR. S.ArcherJ.ConnellJ. (2010). A systematic replication and extension of using incremental rehearsal to improve multiplication skills: An investigation of generalization. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 93–105. doi:10.1007/s10864-010-9102-9
12.
CoddingR. S.BurnsM. K.LukitoG. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 36–47. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x
13.
CookB. G.CookS. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71–82. doi:10.1177/0022466911420877
14.
DowkerA. (2003). Young children’s estimates for addition: The zone of partial knowing and understanding. In BaroodyA. J.DowkerA. (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 243–265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
DuhonG. J.HouseS. H.StinnettT. A. (2012). Evaluating the generalization of math fact fluency gains across paper and computer performance modalities. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 335–345. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.01.003
16.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173. doi:10.1177/001440290807400202
17.
GearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201
18.
GearyD. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of individual differences in achievement growth mathematics: A five year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539–1552. doi:10.1037/a0025510
19.
GearyD. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23–27. doi:10.1177/0963721412469398
20.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
21.
GerstenR.JordanN. CFlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040301
22.
GicklingE.ThompsonV. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205–218. doi:10.1177/001440298505200302
23.
GrafmanJ. M.CatesG. L. (2010). The differential effects of two self-managed math instruction procedures: Cover, copy, and compare versus copy, cover, and compare. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 153–165. doi:10.1002/pits.20459
24.
GreenwoodC. R.DelquadriJ. C.HallR. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In HewardW. L.HeronT. E.HillD. S.Trap-PorterJ. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25.
HechtS. A.CloseL.SantisiM. (2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 277–302. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.08.003
26.
HospM. K.HospJ. L. (2016). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
HuntJ. H.VasquezE.III. (2014). Effects of ratio strategies intervention on knowledge of ratio equivalence for students with learning disability. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 180–190. doi:10.1177/0022466912474102
28.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory Into Practice, 50, 12–19. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.534912
29.
JosephL. M.KonradM.CatesG.VajcnerT.EveleighE.FishleyK. M. (2012). A meta-analytic review of the cover-copy-compare and variations of this self-management procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 122–136. doi:10.1002/pits.20622
30.
KubinaR.YurichK. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved.
31.
LeeD. L. (2006). Facilitating transitions between and within academic tasks an application of behavioral momentum. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 312–317. doi:10.1177/07419325060270050601
32.
McDonaldE.ArdoinS. P. (2007). Interspersing easy math problems among challenging problems: detection of interspersal effects in whole-class applications. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 342–354. doi:10.1007/s10864-007-9046-x
33.
McKennaJ. W.ShinM.CiulloS. (2015). Evaluating reading and mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of observation research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 195–207. doi:10.1177/0731948714564576
34.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321. doi:10.1177/0022219408331037
35.
Musti-RaoS.PlatiE. (2015). Comparing two classwide interventions: Implications of using technology for increasing multiplication fact fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 418–437. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9228-x
36.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: A first look. 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-2015). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov
37.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org
38.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
39.
PoncyB. C.SkinnerC. H.JaspersK. E. (2006). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 27–37. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9025-7
40.
RhymerK. N.MorganS. K. (2005). Comparison of the explicit timing and interspersal interventions: Analysis of problem completion rates, student preference, and teacher acceptability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 283–303. doi:10.1007/s10864-005-8651-9
41.
RiccominiP. J.WitzelB. S. (2010). Response to intervention in math. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
42.
RiveraD. M.BryantB. R. (1992). Mathematics instruction for students with special needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 71–86. doi:10.1177/105345129202800203
43.
ShalevR. S. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 765–771. doi:10.1177/08830738040190100601
44.
SkinnerC. H.BambergH. W.SmithE. S.PowellS. S. (1993). Cognitive cover, copy, and compare: Subvocal responding to increase rates of accurate division responding. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 49–56. doi:10.1177/074193259301400107
45.
SkinnerC. H.McLaughlinT. F.LoganP. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295–306. doi:10.1023/A:1022823522040
46.
SkinnerC. H.TurcoT. L.BeattyK. L.RasavageC. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412–420.
47.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BurnsM. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 15–31. doi:10.1177/073724770503000302
48.
WitzelB. S.RiccominiP. J. (2007). Optimizing math curriculum to meet the learning needs of students. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 52, 13–18. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.1.13-18