BryantB. R.BryantD. P.PorterfieldJ.DennisM.FalcomataT.ValentineC.BrewerC.BellK. (2014). The effects of a Tier 3 intervention on the mathematics performance of second grade students with severe mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219414538516
3.
CarlsonM.JacobsS.CoeE.LarsenS.HsuE. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352–378. doi:10.2307/4149958
4.
DoughertyB. J. (2008). Measure up: A quantitative view of early algebra. In KaputJ. J.CarraherD. W.BlantonM. L., (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 389–412). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
DoughertyB.BryantB. R.BryantD. P. (2016). Ratios and proportions. Algebra-readiness intervention modules for at-risk students: Project AIM. Development (Goal 2) award from the Institute for Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Award Number: R324A120364.
6.
DoughertyB.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.DarroughR. L.PfannenstielK. H. (2015). Developing concepts and generalizations to build algebraic thinking: The reversibility, flexibility, and generalization approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 273–281. doi:10.1177/1053451214560892
7.
Fielding-WellsJ.DoleS.MakarK. (2014). Inquiry pedagogy to promote emerging proportional reasoning in primary students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 47–77. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0111-6
8.
FoegenA.MorrisonC. (2010). Putting algebra progress monitoring into practice: Insights from the field. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 95–103. doi:10.1177/1053451210375302
9.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/003465430933431.
10.
KarpK.BushS.DoughertyB. (2015). Avoiding middle grades rules that expire. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21, 208–215. doi:10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.21.4.0208
11.
KrutetskiiV. A. (1976). An investigation of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Soviet Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 2, 5–57.
12.
LobatoJ.EllisA. B.CharlesR. I. (2010). Essential understandings: Ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning (ZbiekR. M., Series Ed.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13.
MorenoR.OzogulG.ReissleinM. (2011). Teaching with concrete and abstract visual representations: Effects on students’ problem solving, problem representations, and learning perceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 32–47. doi:10.1037/a0021995
14.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010) Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org
16.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
NortonS. (2005). The construction of proportional reasoning. In ChickH. L.VincentJ. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 17–24). Melbourne, Australia: PME.
18.
SkempR. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
19.
Van DoorenW.De BockD.VerschaffelL. (2010). From addition to multiplication . . . and back: The development of students’ additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 360–381. doi:10.1080/07370008.2010.488306