ACTInc. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2.
CortiellaC.HorowitzS. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
3.
FleschR. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 221–223.
4.
HoffmanJ.SaboD.BlissJ.HoyW. (1994). Building a culture of trust. Journal of School Leadership, 4, 484–501.
5.
HughesP. (2011). Five 4ths of July. New York, NY: Viking.
KennedyM. J.DeshlerD. D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 33, 289–298. doi:10.1177/073194871003300406
8.
LeeC. D.SpratleyA. (2010). Reading in the disciplines: The challenges of adolescent literacy. Final report from Carnegie Corporation of New York’s Council on Advancing Adolescent Literacy. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
9.
LeeH. (1982). To kill a mockingbird. New York, NY: Warner Books.
LobelA. (1970). Frog and toad are friends. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
12.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010c). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects: Appendix A. Research supporting key elements of the standards. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
NewmanL., & Institute of Education Sciences. (Eds.). (2006). General education participation and academic performance of students with learning disabilities: Facts from NLTS2 (NCSER 2006-3001). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research.
SilversteinS. (1964). The giving tree. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
18.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.McCulleyL.Stillman-SpisakS.VaughnS.SimmonsD.. . . HairrellA. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 32, 199–222. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.910718
19.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevinP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from 222.nlts2.org/reports/2005_06/nlts2_report_2005_06_complete.pdf
20.
WexlerJ.MitchellM. A.ClancyE.SilvermanR. D. (in press). An investigation of literacy practices in high school science classrooms. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties. doi:10.1080/10573569.2016.1193832
21.
WirtJ.ChoyS.RooneyP.ProvasnikS.SenA.TobinR. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004- 077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004077.pdf
22.
YoppH. K.YoppR. H. (2006). Primary students and informational texts. Science and Children, 44(3), 22–25.