BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
2.
BrowderD. M.LeeA.MimsP. (2011). Using shared stories and individual response modes to promote comprehension and engagement in literacy for students with multiple, severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 1–14.
3.
BrowderD. M.MimsP. J.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.LeeA. (2008). Teaching elementary students with multiple disabilities to participate in shared stories. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 3–12. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.3
4.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.WakemanS.TrelaK.BakerJ.N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 309–321. doi:10.1177/154079690603100404
5.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. doi:10.1177/10883576070220040301
CopelandS. R. (2007). Literacy for life. In CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (Eds.). Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 157–176). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
DiddenR.de GraaffS.NelemansM.VoorenM.LancioniG. (2006). Teaching sight words to children with moderate to mild mental retardation: Comparison between instructional procedures. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111, 357–365. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[357:TSWTCW]2.0.CO;2
10.
DiddenR.PrinsenH.SigafoosJ. (2000). The blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 317–320. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-317
11.
DittlingerL. H.LermanD. C. (2011). Further analysis of picture interference when teaching word recognition to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 341–349. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-341
12.
DowningJ. E. (2005). Teaching literacy to students with significant disabilities: Strategies for the K–12 classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
FossettB.MirendaP. (2006). Sight word reading in children with developmental disabilities: A comparison of paired associate and picture-to-text matching instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 411–429. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.05.006
15.
HansberryL. (1958). A raisin in the sun. New York: Random House.
16.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2014). Improving listening comprehension responses for students with moderate intellectual disability during literacy class. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 39, 11–29. doi:10.1177/1540796914534634
17.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.JimenezB. (2014). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 60–77.
18.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD.WakemanS. (2013). Helping students with moderate and severe intellectual disability access grade-level text. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45, 14–23. doi:10.1177/004005991304500302
19.
HudsonM. E.TestD. W. (2011). Evaluating the evidence base of shared story reading to promote literacy for students with extensive support needs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 36, 34–45. doi:10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.34
20.
KeefeE. B. (2007). Vocabulary development. In CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (Eds.). Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate to severe disabilities (pp. 95–108). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
21.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). School’s not really a place for reading: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 26, 1–12. doi:10.2511/rpsd.26.1.1
22.
KliewerC.FitzgeraldL. M.Meyer-MorkJ.HartmanP.English-SandP.RaschkeD. (2004). Citizenship for all in the literate community: An ethnography of young children with significant disabilities in inclusive early childhood settings. Harvard Educational Review, 74, 373–403. doi:10.17763/haer.74.4.p46171013714642x
23.
LightJ. (1997). “Let’s go star fishing”: Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171. doi:10.1080/ 07434619712331277978
24.
MimsP. J.BrowderD. M.BakerJ. N.LeeA.SpoonerF. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 44, 409–420.
25.
MimsP. J.HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M. (2012). Using read-alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 27, 67–80. doi:10.1177/1088357612446859
26.
MooneyM. E. (2001). Text forms and features: A resource for intentional teaching. Somers, NY: Richard C. Owen.
RupparA. L.AfacanK. A.YangY. L.PickettK. J. (in press). Embedded shared reading to increase literacy in an inclusive English/language arts class: Preliminary efficacy and ecological validity. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
29.
SnellM. E.ChenL. Y.HooverK. (2006). Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 31, 203–214. doi:10.1177/154079690603100301
30.
SoukupJ. H.WehmeyerM. L.BashinskiS. M.BovairdJ. A. (2007). Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 101–120. doi:10.1177/001440290707400106
31.
SteinbeckJ. (1994). Of mice and men. New York: Penguin Books.
32.
TrelaK.JimenezB. A. (2013). From different to differentiated: Using “ecological framework” to support personally relevant access to general curriculum for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 38, 117–119. doi:10.2511/027494813807714537
33.
WehmeyerM. L.LattinD. L.Lapp-RinckerG.AgranM. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 262–272. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050201
34.
WuH. M.SolmanR. T. (1993). Effective use of pictures as extra stimulus prompts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 144–160. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01047.x