BrownB. B.KluteC. (2003). Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In AdamsG. R.BerzonskyM. D. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 330–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
CadwalladerT.WagnerM.GarzaN. (2003). Participation in extracurricular activities. In WagnerM.CadwalladerT.MarderC. (Eds.), Life outside the classroom for youth with disabilities (pp. 4-1–4-8). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
3.
CarterE. W.SwedeenB.MossC. K. (2012). Engaging youth with and without significant disabilities in inclusive service learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(5), 46–54.
4.
CosterW.LawM.BedellG.LiljenquistK.KaoY.-C.KhetaniM.TeplickyR. (2012). School participation, supports and barriers of students with and without disabilities. Child: Care, health, and development, 39, 535–543. doi:10.1111/cch.12046
5.
FieldS.MartinJ.MillerR.WardM.WehmeyerM. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
6.
GreenF. P.SchleienS. J.MactavishJ.BenepeS. (1995). Non-disabled adults’ perceptions of relationships in early stages of arranged partnerships with peers with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 91–108.
7.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
KleinertH. L.MiracleS.Sheppard-JonesK. (2007). Including students with moderate and severe intellectual disabilities in school extracurricular and community recreation activities. Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 45, 46–55. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[46:ISWMAS]2.0.CO;2
10.
KonradM.WalkerA. R.FowlerC. H.TestD. W.WoodW. M. (2008). A model for aligning self-determination and general curriculum standards. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(3), 53–64.
11.
LlerasC. (2008). Do skills and behaviors in high school matter? The contribution of noncognitive factors in explaining differences in educational attainment and earnings. Social Science Research, 37, 888–902. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.004
12.
MahoneyJ. L.HarrisA. L.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the overscheduling hypothesis. Social Policy Report, 20(4), 3–32.
13.
McGuireJ.McDonnellJ. (2008). Relationships between recreation and levels of self-determination for adolescents and young adults with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 154–163. doi:10.1177/0885728808315333
14.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (1995). Extracurricular participation and student engagement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs95/web/95741.asp
15.
OliverC. (2014). The fundamentals of strengths-based practice. Relational Child and Youth Care Practice, 27(3), 46–49.
16.
PowersK. M.Gil-KashiwabaraE.GeenanS. J.PowersL.BalandránJ.PalmerC. (2005). Mandates and effective transition planning practices reflected in IEPs. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 47–59. doi:10.1177/08857288050280010701
17.
RappC. A.SaleebeyD.SullivanW. P. (2006). The future of strengths-based social work. Advances in Social Work, 6, 79–90.
18.
SimeonssonR. J.CarlsonD.HuntingtonG. S.McMillenJ. S.BrentJ. L. (2001). Students with disabilities: A national survey of participation in school activities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(2), 49–63.
19.
StancliffeR. J. (2001). Living with support in the community: Predictors of choice and self-determination. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 91–98.
20.
WehmeyerM. (1997). Self-determination as an educational outcome: A definitional framework and implications for intervention. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 9, 175–209.
21.
WehmeyerM. L.AgranM.HughesC. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.