Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barbour
M.
(2011 ). Today’s student and virtual schooling: The reality, the challenges, the promise . Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning , 13 (1 ), 5 –25 .
2.
Cavanaugh
C.
Repetto
J.
Wayer
N.
Spitler
C.
(2013 ). Online learning for students with disabilities: A framework for success . Journal of Special Education Technology , 28 (1 ), 1 –8 .
3.
Horn
M. B.
Staker
H.
(2011 ). The rise of K–12 blended learning . Innosight Institute . Retrieved from http://www.leadcommission.org/sites/default/files/The%20Rise%20of%20K-12%20Blended%20Learning_0.pdf
4.International Association for K-12 Online Learning . (2012 ). Fast facts about online learning . Vienna, VA : Author . Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/press/docs/nacol_fast_facts.pdf
5.LD Online . (2002 ). Motivation: The key to academic success . Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/5730/
6.
Liu
F.
Cavanaugh
C.
(2012 ). Factors influencing student academic performance in online high school algebra . Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning , 27 (2 ), 149 –167 .
7.
Müller
E.
(2010 ). Virtual K-12 public school programs and students with disabilities: Issues and recommendations . In Project Forum . Alexandria : National Association of State Directors of Special Education . Retrieved from http://www.ncset.org/publications/viewdesc.asp?id=1688
8.NCLD Editorial Team . (n.d. ). What is executive function? Retrieved from http://www.ncld.org/types-learning-disabilities/executive-function-disorders/what-is-executive-function
9.
Picciano
A. G.
Seaman
J.
(2007 ). K-12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators . Newburyport, MA : The Sloan Consortium . Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/K-12_06
10.
Rhim
L.
Kowal
J.
(2008 ). Demystifying special education in virtual charter schools . Alexandria, VA : Special Education Technical Assistance for Charter Schools Project . Retrieved from http://184.168.115.17/17137/files/17125/9107/special_report_rhim.pdf
11.
Roblyer
M. D.
(2005 ). Who plays well in the virtual sandbox? Characteristics of successful online students and teachers . SIGTel Bulletin , 2 . Retrieved from http://web.archive.org/web/20060930130650/http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGTel_Telelearning_/SIGTel_Bulletin2/Archive/2005_20067/2005_July_-_Roblyer.htm
12.
Roblyer
M. D.
Davis
L.
Mills
S. C.
Marshall
J.
Pape
L.
(2008 ). Toward practical procedures for predicting and promoting success in virtual school students . American Journal of Distance Education , 22 (2 ), 90 –109 . doi:10.1080/08923640802039040
13.
Rose
D. H.
Meyer
A.
(2002 ). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning . Alexandria, VA : ASCD .
14.
Staker
H.
(2011 ). The rise of K-12 blended learning: Profiles of emerging models . Mountain View, CA : Innosight Institute . Retrieved from http://www.innosightinstitute.org/media-room/publications/blended-learning/
15.
Watson
J.
Murin
A.
Vashaw
L.
Gemin
B.
Rapp
C.
(2012 ). Keeping pace with K-12 online & blended learning: An annual review of policy and practice . Durango, CO : Evergreen Education Groups . Retrieved from http://kpk12.com/cms/wp-content/uploads/KeepingPace2012.pdf