Causton-TheoharisJ.GiangrecoM. F.DoyleM. B.VadasyP. F. (2007). Paraprofessionals: The “sous-chefs” of literacy instruction. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(1), 56-62.
2.
DanielsonL.WexlerL.RosenquistC. (2014). Introduction to the TEC special issue on data-based individualization. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 6-12.
3.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2012). Smart RTI: A next-generation approach to multilevel prevention. Exceptional Children, 78(3), 263-279.
4.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP. G.SimmonsD. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Education Research Journal, 34(1), 174-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001174
5.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301-323.
6.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2014). What is intensive instruction and why is it important?TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 13-18.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007a). Progress monitoring in the context of response-to-intervention. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007b). Using CBM for progress monitoring in reading. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
10.
KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (in press). Essentials of a tiered intervention system to support unique learners: Recommendations from research and practice. In MascoloJ. T.FlanaganD. P.AlfonsoV. C. (Eds.), Essentials of planning, selecting, and tailoring intervention: Addressing the needs of the unique learner. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11.
LemonsC. J.KlooA.ZigmondN. (2011). Implementing modified achievement tests: Questions, challenges, pretending, and potential negative consequences. In ElliottS. N.KettlerR. J.BeddowP. A.KurzA. (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 295-317). New York: Springer.
12.
National Center on Intensive Intervention. (2013). Data-based individualization: A framework for intensive intervention. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
VaughnS.WanzekJ.MurrayC. S.RobertsG. (2012). Intensive interventions for students struglling in reading and mathematics: A practice guide. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
14.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
15.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16.
ZigmondN.KlooA. (2011). General and special education are (and should be) different. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 160-172). New York: Routledge.