ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM. T.MoodyS. W. (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399–415.
2.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM. T.MoodyS. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure?Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.605
3.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301–322.
4.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
5.
GilbertJ. K.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BoutonB.BarqueroL. A.ChoE. (2013). Efficacy of a first-grade responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 135–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.45
6.
McMasterK. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463.
7.
O’ConnorR. (2000). Increasing the intensity of interventions in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1501_5
8.
O’ConnorR.FuchsL. S. (2013). Responsiveness to intervention in the elementary grades: Implications for early childhood education. In BuysseV.Peisner-FeinbergE.Cantler(Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (RTI) in early childhood education (pp. 41–56). Baltimore: Brookes.
9.
SchillerE.SanfordC.BlackorbyJ. (2008). A national profile of the classroom experiences and academic performance of students with LD: A special topic report from the Special Education Elementary Longitudinal. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.seels.net/info_reports/national_profile_students_learning_disabilities.htm
10.
SteckerP. M. (2005). Tertiary intervention: Using progress monitoring with intensive services. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39(5), 50–57.
11.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
12.
UlmanE. (2013, May19). How to be a “woman programmer.”The New York Times, p. 5.
13.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A.JenkinsJ. R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 227–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00048
14.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. A.FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
15.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
16.
WagnerM.MarderC.BlackorbyJ.CametoR.NewmanL.LevineP.Davies-MercierE. (2003). The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_11/nlts2_report_2003_11_complete.pdf
17.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2003). Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_12/nlts2_report_2003_12_complete.pdf
18.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
19.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students demonstrating insufficient response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126–142.
20.
WanzekJ.VaughnS.ScammaccaN. K.MetzK.MurrayC. S.RobertsG.DanielsonL. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 163–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654313477212