BrickerD.CaptB.Pretti-FrontczakK.JohnsonJ.SlentzK.StrakaE.WaddellM. (2002). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children: Test (2nd ed., Vol. 2). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2.
BuysseV.Peisner-FeinbergE. (2010). Recognition & Response: Response to intervention for Pre-K. Young Exceptional Children, 13 (4), 2–13.
3.
BuzhardtJ.GreenwoodC. R.WalkerD.AndersonR.HowardW.CartaJ. J. (2011). Effects of web-based support on early Head Start home visitors' use of evidence-based intervention decision making and growth in children's expressive communication. NHSA Dialog, 14 (3), 121–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15240754.2011.587614.
4.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS. A.SilvermanC. (2001). Strengths-based child portfolios: A professional development activity to alter perspectives of children with special needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 152–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027112140102100303.
5.
CarothersD. E.TaylorR. L. (2003). The use of portfolios for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18 (2), 121–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108835760301800206.
6.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2003). Glossary of assessment terms and acronyms used in assessing special education students. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
DodgeD.BickartT. S.HeromanC.BoyleK. (2009). Teaching Strategies' Creative Curriculum for preschool: Opening doors for teachers, children, and families. Early Childhood Services: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Effectiveness, 3 (3), 263–280.
8.
FishW. W. (2008). The IEP meeting: Perceptions of parents of students who receive special education services. Preventing School Failure, 53 (1), 8–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.1.8-14.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it. Reading Research Quarterly, 41 (1), 93–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.
11.
Get It, Got It, Go! [Online database]. Retrieved from http://ggg.umn.edu.
12.
GreenwoodC.CartaJ. J. (2010). Conceptual background. In CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC.WalkerD.BuzhardtJ. (Eds.), Using IGDIs: Monitoring progress and improving intervention for infants and young children (pp. 9–22). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13.
GronlundG.EngelB. (2001). The Focused Portfolio: A complete assessment of the young child. Beltsville: MD: Red Leaf Press.
14.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2006 & Supp. V. 2011).
15.
Johnson-MartinN. M.AttermeierS. M.HackerB. J. (2004). The Carolina Curriculum for preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
16.
MeiselsS. J.LiawF.DorfmanA.NelsonR. F. (1995). The Work Sampling System: Reliability and validity of a performance assessment for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 277–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90008-X.
17.
MeiselsS. J.MarsdenD. B.JablonS. R.DichtelmillerD.DichtelmillerM. (2013). The work sampling system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
18.
PierceC. D.BrunsD. A. (2013). Aligning components of recognition and response and response to intervention to improve transition to primary school. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41 (5), 347–354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0572-3.
19.
StockallN.SmithR. (2013). Alternative assessment portfolios for students with intellectual disabilities: A case study. Exceptionality, 21 (3), 127–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.771557.
20.
ThompsonS. A.BaumgartnerL. (2008). Exploring portfolios in the elementary classroom with students with disabilities/exceptionalities: Timely or time-consuming?Exceptionality Education Canada, 18 (3), 148–165.