ArmbrusterB. B.LehrF.OsbornJ. (2003). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read kindergarten through grade 3. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
2.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343–364.
3.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.WakemanS.TrelaK.BakerJ. N. (2006). Aligning instruction with academic content standards: Finding the link. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 309–321.
4.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220040301.
5.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
DonnellanA. (1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 141–150.
8.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.JimenezB. (in press). Effects of a peer-delivered system of least prompts intervention and adapted science read-alouds on listening comprehension for participants with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
9.
HudsonM. E.BrowderD. M.WakemanS. (2013). Helping students with moderate and severe intellectual disability access grade-level text. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45 (3), 14–23.
10.
JamesonJ. M.McDonnellJ.PolychronisS.RiesenT. (2008). Embedded, constant time delay instruction by peers without disabilities in general education classrooms. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 346–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/2008.46:346-363.
11.
KinneyJ. (2007). Diary of a wimpy kid. New York, NY: Abrams.
12.
MimsP.BrowderD. M.BakerJ.LeeA.SpoonerF. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 65–78.
13.
MimsP.HudsonM.BrowderD. (2012). Using read alouds of grade-level biographies and systematic prompting to promote comprehension for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 27, 65–78.
14.
MurphyJ. (2001, October). Leadership for literacy: Policy leverage points. Conference Proceedings for Educational Testing Service/Education Commission of the States Conference on Leadership for Literacy, Washington, DC.
15.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf.
16.
ParkL. S. (2001). A single shard. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
17.
RyanP. M. (2000). Esperanza rising. New York, NY: Scholastic.
18.
SaundersA. F.BethuneK. S.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M. (2013). Solving the common core equation: Teaching mathematics CCSS to students with moderate and severe disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 45 (3), 24–33.
19.
SchenningH.KnightV.SpoonerF. (2013). Effects of structured inquiry and graphic organizers on social studies comprehension by students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 526–540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.007.
20.
SteinbeckJ. (1947). The pearl. New York, NY: Viking.
21.
StorkF. X. (2009). Marcelo in the real world. New York, NY: Scholastic.