BryantB. R.BryantD. P. (2008). Introduction to the special series: Mathematics and learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31 (1), 3–9.
2.
ButlerP. L.BeckinghamB.LauscherH. J. Novak (2005). Promoting strategic learning by eighth-grade students struggling in mathematics: A report of three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20 (3), 156–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00130.x.
3.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf.
4.
FuchsL.FuchsD. (2005). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 39 (1), 45–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010501.
5.
FuchsL.FuchsD.CraddockC.HollenbeckK.HamlettC.SchatschneiderC. (2008). Effects of group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk students' math problem solving: Are two tiers of prevention better than one?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (3), 491–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.491.
6.
GarrettA.MazzoccoM.BakerL. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with or without math disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21 (2), 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00208.x.
7.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
8.
GewertzC. (2012). Success of standards depends on translation for classroom. Education Week, 31 (29), S6–S11.
9.
HartS.PetrillS.ThompsonL.PlominR. (2009). The ABC's of math: A genetic analysis of mathematics and its links with reading ability and general cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (2), 388–402.
10.
JitendraA.StarJ. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory Into Practice, 50 (1), 12–19.
11.
LembkeE.SteckerP. (2007). Curriculum-based measurement in mathematics: An evidence-based formative assessment procedure. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
12.
LenzB. K. (2006). Creating school-wide conditions for high-quality learning strategy classroom instruction. Intervention in School & Clinic, 41 (5), 262–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410050201.
13.
MontagueM.EndersC.DietzS. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34 (4), 262–272.
14.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
ScheiterK.GerjetsP.SchuhJ. (2010). The acquisition of problem-solving in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38 (5), 487–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9114-9.
19.
SimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J. (1996). A focus on curriculum design: When children fail. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28 (7), 1–31.
20.
SwansonH.L.JermanO.ZhengX. (2008). Growth in working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (2), 343–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.343.
21.
SwansonH. L.LussierC.OroscoM. (Sept. 9, 2011). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions on word problem solving and working memory in children with math disabilities. Paper presented at the fall Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Conference, Washington, DC.
22.
WadlingtonE.WadlingtonP. (2008). Helping students with mathematical disabilities to succeed. Preventing School Failure, 53 (1), 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.1.2-7.
23.
WilsonG.BlednickJ. (2011). Teaching in tandem. Effective co-teaching in the inclusive classroom. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
24.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA.OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012–4055). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch.