ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
EdmundsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325998.
3.
Faggella-LubyM. N.DeshlerD. D. (2008). Reading comprehension in adolescents with LD: What we know; What we need to learn. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23 (2), 70–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00265.x.
4.
FuchsD.DeshlerD. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22 (2), 129–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00237.x.
5.
FuchsD.MockD.MorganP. L.YoungC. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18 (3), 157–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00072.
6.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2010). Commentary: Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39 (1), 22–28.
7.
GrahamS.HebertM. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
8.
KamilM. L.BormanG. D.DoleJ.KralC. C.SalingerT.TorgesenJ. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
9.
LeeHarper. (2006). To Kill a Mockingbird. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
10.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ. E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593593.
11.
National High School Center, National Center on Response to Intervention, and Center on Instruction. (2010). Tiered interventions in high schools: Using preliminary “lessons learned” to guide ongoing discussion. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
12.
ReschlyD. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510–515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060601.
13.
SimonsenB.ShawS.Faggella-LubyM.SugaiG.CoyneM.RheinB.AlfanoM. (2010). A school-wide model for service delivery: Redefining special educators as interventionists. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 17–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324396.
14.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14 (3), 129–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1403_1.
15.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. D.FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21. PMid:21479079 PMCid:3072689.
16.
VaughnS.WexlerJ.RobertsG.BarthA. A.CirinoP. T.RomainM. A.DentonC. A. (2011). Effects of individualized and standardized interventions on middle school students with reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 77, 391–407. PMid:23125463 PMCid:3485696.
17.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2008). Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 126–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219407313426.
