CannellaH. I.O'ReillyM. F.LancioniG. (2005). Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2004.01.006.
2.
DeLeonI. G.IwataB. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferencers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 519–533.
3.
FisherW.PiazzaC. C.BowmanL. G.HagopianL. P.OwensJ. C.SlevinI. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
4.
FlemingC. V.WheelerG. M.Cannella-MaloneH. I.BasbagillA. R.ChungY. C.DayK. Graham (2010). An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 266–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17518421003705706.
5.
PaceG. M.IvancicM. T.EdwardsG. L.IwataB. A.PageT. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforce value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249.
6.
TullisC. A.Cannella-MaloneH. I.BasbigillA. R.YeagerA.FlemingC. V.PayneD.WuP. (2011). Review of the choice and preference assessment literature for individuals with severe to profound disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 576–595.
