CookL.FriendM. (2004, April). Co-teaching: Principles, practices, and pragmatics. Paper presented at the New Mexico Public Education Department Quarterly Special Education Meeting, Albuquerque, NM.
2.
DiekerL. A. (2001). What are the characteristics of “effective” middle and high school co-taught teams for students with disabilities?Preventing School Failure, 46(1), 14–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10459880109603339.
3.
DiekerL. A. (2006). The co-teaching lesson plan book (3rd ed.). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
4.
EllisE. S. (2000). The LINCS vocabulary strategy. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
5.
EspinC.DenoS. (1995). Curriculum-based measures for secondary students: Utility and task specificity of text-based reading and vocabulary measures for predicting performance on content-area tasks. Diagnostique, 20(4), 121–42.
6.
MagieraK.SmithC.ZigmondN.GebauerK. (2005). Benefits of co-teaching in secondary mathematics classes. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 37(3), 20–24.
7.
MoroccoC.C.AguilarC.M. (2002). Coteaching for content understanding: A school-wide model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13, 315–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S1532768XJEPC1304_04.
8.
MurawskiW. W. (2012). 10 Tips for using co-planning time more effectively. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 44(4), 8–15.
ScantleburyK.Gallo-FoxJ.WassellB. (2007). Coteaching as a model for pre-service secondary science teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 967–981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.008.
11.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416.
WannarkaR. (2010). Peer-mediated constant time delay to teach content area vocabulary to middle school students with behavior problems (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database (Publication No. AAT 3374563).
14.
WannarkaR.RuhlK. (2008). Seating arrangements that promote positive academic and behavioural outcomes: A review of empirical research. Support for Learning, 23(2), 89–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9604.2008.00375.x.
15.
WelchM. (2000). Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: A formative experimental approach. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 366–377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100606.
