Understanding STEM Education and Supporting Students through Universal Design for Learning

AccessSTEM. (2002–2013). Disability type. Retrieved from http://www.washington.edu/doit/Stem/disability_type.html.

Apple in Education. (2012). iBooks textbooks for iPad. There's nothing textbook about them. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/education/ibooks-textbooks/.

Baldi S. Jin Y. Skemer M. Green P. J. Herget D. Xie H. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context (NCES 2008–016). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008016.pdf.

Basham J. D. Israel M. Maynard K. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM for all. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 9–19.

Basham J. D. Marino M. T. (2010). Introduction to the topical issue: Shaping STEM education for all students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 1–2.

Blankenship T. L. Ayres K. M. Langone J. (2005). Effects of computer-based cognitive mapping on reading comprehension for students with emotional behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 15–23.

CAST. (2011a). Learner variability and universal design for learning (Universal Design for Learning Series) [Video and presentation slides]. Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://udlseries.udlcenter.org/presentations/learner_variability.html?plist=explore.

CAST. (2011b). Universal design for learning guidelines (Version 2.0). Wakefield, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines.

Curry C. Cohen L. Lightbody N. (2006). Universal design in science learning. The Science Teacher, 73(3), 32–37.

Dalton B. Morocco C. Tivnan T. Mead P. (1997). Supported inquiry science: Teaching for conceptual change in urban and suburban classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 670–684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000611.

Jacobson M. J. Archodidou A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer for complex knowledge. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0902_2.

Kaku M. (2011) Physics of the future: How science will shape human destiny and our daily lives by the year 2100. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Katehi L. Pearson G. Feder M. , (Eds.) (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Report from the Committee on K-12 Education for the National Academies. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.

Leddy M. H. (2010). Technology to advance high school and undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 3–8.

Lynch S. Taymans J. Watson A. W. Ochsendorf R. J. Pyke C. Szesze M. J. (2007). Effectiveness of a highly rated science curriculum unit for students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 73, 202–223.

Marino M. T. (2010). Defining a technology research agenda for elementary and secondary students with learning and other high incidence disabilities in inclusive science classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology 25(1), 1–28.

McCleery J. A. Tindal G. A. (1999). Teaching the scientific method to at-risk students and students with learning disabilities through concept anchoring and explicit instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 7–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000102.

Palincsar A. S. Magnusson S. J. Collins K. M. Cutter J. (2001). Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1511293.

Reiser R. A. Dempsey J. V. (2007). Trends and issues in instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Samsonov P. Pedersen S. Hill C. L. (2006). Using problem-based learning software with at-risk students: A case study. Computers in the Schools, 23(1), 111–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J025v23n01_10.

UDL-IRN. (2011). Critical elements of UDL in instruction (Version 1.2). Lawrence, KS: Author. Retrieved from http://udl-irn.org/storage/resources/Critical_Elements1.3.pdf.