AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (2012). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
2.
AultM. J.GastD. L.WoleryM.DoyleP. M. (1992). Data collection and graphing method for teaching chained tasks with the constant time delay procedure. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24(2), 28–33.
3.
BartonE. E.WoleryM. (2010). Training teachers to promote pretend play in young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 85–106. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e31821e995c.
4.
BrowderD. M.LeeA.MimsP. (2011). Using shared stories and individual response modes to promote comprehension and engagement in literacy for students with multiple, severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 339–351.
5.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.JimenezB. (2011). Standards-based individualized education plans and progress monitoring. In BrowderD. M.SpoonerF., Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 42–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
CihakD.FahrenkrogC.AyresK. M.SmithC. (2010). The use of video modeling via a video iPod and a system of least prompts to improve transitional behaviors for students with autism spectrum disorders in the general education class. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 103–115. doi:10.1177/1098300709332346.
7.
CollinsB. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
8.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
9.
DoyleP. M.WoleryM.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A review of procedural parameters. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 28–40.
10.
HewardW. L. (2012). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
11.
KarlJ.CollinsB. C.HagerK. D.AultM. J. (in press). Teaching core content embedded in a functional activity to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
12.
ManleyK.CollinsB. C.StenhoffD. M.KleinertH. (2008). Using a system of least prompts procedure to teach telephone skills to elementary students with cognitive disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 221–236. doi:10.1007/s10864-008-9065-2.
13.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.FieldsE. A. (2008). Evaluation of a portable DVD player and system of least prompts to self-prompt cooking task completion by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 179–190. doi:10.1177/0022466907313348.
14.
SnellM. E.BrownF. (2011). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
15.
SteckerP. M.LembkeE. S.FoegenA. (2008). Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 48–58.
16.
WestlingD. L.FoxL. (2009). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
17.
WoleryM.AultM. J.DoyleP. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. White Plains, NY: Longman.
18.
YanardaM.BirkanB.YilmazI.KonukmanF.AgbugaB.LiebermanL. (2011). The effects of least-to-most prompting procedure teaching basic tennis skills to children with autism. Kinesiology, 43, 44–55.