A Guide to Choosing Web-Based Curriculum-Based Measurements for the Classroom

Codding R. S. Skowron J. Pace G. M. (2005). Back to basics: Training teachers to interpret curriculum-based measurement data and create observable and measurable objectives. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 165–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bin.194.

Deno S. L. (2003). Curriculum-based measures: Development and perspectives. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28 (3–4), 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073724770302800302.

Detgen A. Yamashita M. Davis B. Wraight S. (2011). State policies and procedures on response to intervention in the midwest region. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No. 116). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. (1993). Technological advances linking the assessment of student's academic proficiency to instructional planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12 (1), 49–62. Retrieved from http://www.tamcec.org/jset/.

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hosp M. K. Hamlett C. L. (2003). The potential for diagnostic analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28 (3–4), 13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073724770302800303.

He Q. Tymms P. (2005). A computer-assisted test design and diagnosis system for use by classroom teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 419–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13652729.2005.00148.x.

Hosp M. K. Hosp J. L. Howell K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010, March). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/pdf/rtiessentialcomponents_042710.pdf.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2002).

Stecker P. M. Fuchs L. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 15, 128–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/SLDRP1503.

Stecker P. M. Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. (2005). Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795–819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113.

Tsuei M. (2008). A web-based curriculum-based measurement system for class-wide ongoing assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24 (1), 47–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00242.x.

Wang T. (2011). Developing web-based assessment strategies for facilitating junior high school students to perform self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment. Computers & Education, 57, 1801–1812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.003.

Wang T. H. Wang K. H. Wang W. L. Huang S. C. Chen S. Y. (2004). Web-based assessment and test analyses (WATA) system: Development and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20 (1), 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00066.x.

Wesson C. Fuchs L. S. Tindal G. Mirkin P. K. Deno S. L. (1986). Facilitating the efficiency of on-going curriculum-based measurement. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 166–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088840648600900403.