American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication: Technical report. Retrieved from www.asha.org/policy.
2.
BaubyJ. D. (1997). The diving bell and the butterfly. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
3.
BeckA. R.FritzH.KellerA.DennisM. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13–26. doi:10.1080 /07434610012331278874.
4.
BeckA. R.Fritz-VerticchioH. (2003). The influence of information and role-playing experiences on children's attitudes toward peers who use AAC. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 51–60. doi:10.1044/105 8-0360(2003/052).
5.
BeukelmanD. R.MirendaP. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
6.
BuzolichM. J.LungerJ. (1995). Empowering system users in peer training. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 37–48. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277129.
7.
CarterM.MaxwellK. (1998). Promoting interaction with children using augmentative and alternative communication through a peer-directed intervention. International Journal of Disability, 45(1), 75–96. doi:10.1080/1034912980450106.
8.
DiSalvoC. A.OswaldD. P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interaction of children with autism: Consideration of peer expectancies. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(4), 198–207. doi:10.1177/10883576020170040201.
9.
HolcombN. (1990). Sarah's surprise. Hollidaysburg, PA: Jason & Nordic.
10.
Kent-WalshJ.McNaughtonD. (2005). Communication partner instruction in AAC: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 195–204. doi: 10.1080/07434610400006646.
11.
LightJ. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 76, 98–107. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274657.
12.
LilienfeldM.AlantE. (2005). The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: The evaluation of a peer-training program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 278–294. doi: 10.1080/07434610500103467.
13.
LundS.LightJ. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part III-Contributing factors. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(4), 323–335. doi:10.1080/07434610600720442.
14.
McAfeeJ. L. (2002). Navigating the social world. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.
15.
McConnellS. R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 351–372. doi:10.1023/A:1020537805154.
16.
McNaughtonD.RackenspergerT.Benedek-WoodE.KrezmanC.WilliamsM. B.LightJ. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007.
17.
MorganS.KingA. (February, 2011). Peer-training: Increasing social competence in children who use AAC. Paper presented at the meeting of the Illinois Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rosemont, IL.
18.
Rummel-HudsonR. (2008). Schuyler's monster. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
19.
SigafoosJ. (1999). Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 183–190. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278715.
20.
StobieJ. (Producer & Director). (2005). Freedom machines [Documentary]. Harriman, NY: New Day Films.
21.
TrembathD.BalandinS.TogherL.StancliffeR. J. (2009). Peer-mediated teaching and augmentative and alternative communication for preschool-aged children with autism. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(2), 173–186. doi:10.1080/13668250902845210.
22.
TrottierN.KampL.MirendaP. (2011). Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(1), 26–39. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.546810.