Progress Monitoring to Support Science Learning for All Students

Deno S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.

Espin C. A. Shin J. Busch T. W. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 353–365.

Fuchs L. S. Deno S. L. Mirkin P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.

Good R. Jefferson G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity, In Shinn M. R. (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61–88). New York, NY: Guilford.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 [Amending 20 U.S.C. § 1462 et seq.].

National Center on Response to Intervention. (March 2010). Essential components of RTI-A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).

Vannest K. Adiguzel T. Parker R. E. (2006). Science Key Vocabulary Assessment (SKeVA©): A web based system for formative assessment and instruction. (Beta Version) [web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. Retrieved from http://skeva.tamu.edu/index.php.

Vannest K. J. Parker R. I. Dyer N. (2009). Progress monitoring in grade 5 science for low achievers. Journal of Special Education, 44(4), 221–233. doi:10.1177/002246690934312.