BiancarosaC.SnowC. E. (2006). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
2.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: The cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co.
3.
BrownellM. T.HirschE.SeoS. (2004). Meeting the demand for highly qualified special education teachers at a time of severe shortages: What should policymakers consider?. Journal of Special Education, 38, 56–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F00224669040380010501.
4.
CurtisChristopher Paul (2004). Bud, Not Buddy. New York, NY: Yearling.
5.
DukeN. K.PearsonD. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In FarstrupA. E.SamuelsS. J. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598%2F0872071774.10.
6.
EzellH. K.HunsickerS. A.QuinqueM. M. (1997). Comparison of two strategies for teaching reading comprehension skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 365–382.
7.
FentyN. S.McDuffie-LandrumK. (2011). Collaboration through co-teaching. Kentucky English Bulletin, 60, 21–26.
8.
FisherD.FreyN. (2007). A tale of two middle schools: The difference in structure and instruction. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51, 204–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598%2FJAAL.51.3.1.
9.
FriendM.CookL. (2010). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. (6th ed.) New York, NY: Longman.
10.
GerstenR.WilliamsJ.FuchsL.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with disabilities: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543071002279.
11.
HallK. L. (1996). Reading comprehension for comprehension success: Intermediate level. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
KinniburghL. H.ShawE. L. (2008). Using Question—Answer Relationships to build reading comprehension in science. Science Activities, 45(4), 19–28.
LevineP.WagnerM. (2003). Secondary school students' experiences in special education classrooms. In WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (Eds.), Going to school: Instructional contexts, programs, and participation of secondary school students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (pp. 69–76). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
RaphaelT. E.AuK. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. The Reading Teacher, 59, 206–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598%2FRT.59.3.1.
17.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 75, 392–416.
18.
ShealyM. W.McHattonP. A.FarmerJ. (2009). What does “highly qualified” mean for urban special educators?. Urban Education, 44, 410–426.
19.
U.S. Department of Education. (2008). National center for educational statistics. Washington, DC: Author.