CarterN.PraterM. A.JacksonA.MarchantM. (2009). Educator's perceptions of collaborative planning processes for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 60–70.
2.
CawleyJ.ParmarR.FoleyT.SalmonS.RoyS. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311–328.
3.
ChildreA.SandsJ. R.PopeS. T. (2009). Backward design: Targeting depth of understanding for all learners. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 41(5), 6–14.
4.
DexterD. D.ParkY. J.HughesC. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of graphic organizers and science instruction for adolescents with learning disabilities: Implications for the intermediate and secondary science classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 201–213.
5.
FontanaJ. L.ScruggsT.MastropieriM. A. (2007). Mnemonic strategy instruction in inclusive secondary social studies classes. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 345–355.
6.
FoormanB.TorgesenJ. (2001). Critical elements of classroom and small-group instruction promote reading success in all children. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 203–212.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 86–95.
8.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.BurchM.HamlettC. L.OwenR.SchroeterK. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 306–315.
9.
GicklingE. E.HavertapeS. (1981). Curriculum based assessment (CBA). Minneapolis, MN: School Psychology Inservice Training Network.
10.
GoswamiU. (2006). Neuroscience and education: From research to practice?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(5), 406–413.
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), Public Law 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004), [Amending 20 U.S.C. § § 1400 et seq.].
12.
KaganS. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Cooperative Learning.
13.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality. Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279–296.
14.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.BoonR.CarterK. B. (2001). Correlates of inquiry learning in science: Constructing concepts of density and buoyancy. Remedial and Special Education, 22(3), 130–137.
15.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E.GraetzJ. (2005). Cognition and learning in inclusive high school chemistry classes. In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.). Cognition and learning in diverse settings: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 18, pp. 108–118). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
16.
MurawskiW. W.SwansonH. L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data?. Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258–267.
17.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2006).
18.
SantangeloT.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to support students who have “trubol giting thangs into werds.”Remedial and Special Education, 29(2), 78–89.
19.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2004). Science and schooling for learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 270–276.
20.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2007). Science learning in special education: The case for constructed vs. instructed learning. Exceptionality, 15, 57–74.
21.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.OkoloC. M. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–23.
SnellM. E.JanneyR. (2000). Collaborative teaming. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
TherrienW. J.TaylorJ. C.HospJ. L.KaldenbergE. R.GorshJ. (2011). Science instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(4), 188–203.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67, 99–114.
27.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
WigginsG. P.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.