BerganJ. R., & KratochwillT. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
2.
CoddingR. S., & SmythC. A. (2008). Using performance feedback to decrease classroom transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 325–345, doi:10.1080/10474410802463312
3.
ColvinG., FlanneryK. B., SugaiG., & MoneganJ. (2009). Using observational data to provide performance feedback to teachers: A high school case study. Preventing School Failure, 53, 95–104, doi:10.3200/PSFL.53.2.95-104
4.
ColvinG., SugaiG., & PatchingB. (1993). Pre-correction: An instructional approach for managing predictable problem behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 143–150, doi:10.1177 /105345129302800304
5.
ConroyM. A., StichterJ. P., DaunicA., & HaydonT. (2008). Classroom-based research in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 209–222, doi: 10.1177/0022466907310369
6.
FeldmanE. S., & KratochwillT. R. (2003). Problem solving consultation in schools: Past, present, and future directions. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4, 318–330.
7.
GableR. A., & ShoresR. E. (1980). Comparison of procedures for promoting reading proficiency of two children with behavioral and learning disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 5(2), 102–107.
8.
GreshamF. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral interventions. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
9.
GreshamF. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326–343.
10.
GreshamF. M., MacMillanD. L., Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E., & BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205, doi: 10.1207/SLDRP1504_4
11.
HawkinsR. O., MorrisonJ. Q., Musti-RaoS., & HawkinsJ. A. (2008). Treatment integrity for academic interventions in real-world settings. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 2, 1–15.
12.
HulacD. M., & BensonN. (2010). The use of group contingencies for preventing and managing disruptive behaviorsIntervention in School and Clinic, 45, 257–262. doi:10.1177/1053451209353442.
13.
KratochwillT. R., ElliottS. N., & StoiberK. C. (2002). Best practices in school-based problem-solving consultation. In ThomasA., GrimesJ., (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV, (pp. 583–608). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
14.
LampiA. R., FentyN. S., & BeaunaeC. (2005). Making the three Ps easier: Praise, proximity, and precorrection. Beyond Behavior, 15(1), 8–12.
15.
MesaJ., Lewis-PalmerT., & ReinkeW. (2005). Providing teachers with performance feedback on praise to reduce student problem behavior. Beyond Behavior, 15(1), 3–7.
16.
OdomS. L., BrantlingerE., GerstenR., HornerR. H., ThompsonB., & HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
17.
ShapiroE. S. (2004). Academic skills problems workbook (Rev.). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
SutherlandK. S., WehbyJ. H., & Cope-landS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 2–8, doi: 10.1177/106342660000800101
19.
TheodoreL. A., BrayM. A., KehleT. J., & DioguardiR. J. (2004). Contemporary review of group-oriented contingencies for disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 20, 79–101, doi: 10.1300/J370v20n01_06