The A B Cs of Evidence-Based Practice for Teachers

American Educational Research Association. (2009). Definition of scientifically based research. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/Default.aspx?id=6790.

Arreaga-Mayer C. (1998). Increasing active student responding and improving academic performance through classwide peer tutoring. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 89–94. doi: 10.1177/105345129803400204.

Beach R. Carter A. East D. Johnston P. Reinking D. Smith-Burke T. Stahl N. (2007). Resisting commercial influences on accessing scholarship: What literacy researchers need to know and do. In Rowe D. W. Jimenez R. T. Compton D. L. Dickinson D. K. Kim Y. Leander K. M. Risko V. J. (Eds.), 56th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 96–124). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.

Bean R. M. Cassidy J. Grumet J. E. Shelton D. S. Wallis S. R. (2002). What do reading specialists do? Results from a national survey. The Reading Teacher, 55, 736–744.

Becker H. J. (1999, February). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report #1). Irvine, CA: The University of California Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations and the University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://sandbox.ea.ecu.edu.au/staffuse/cnewhous/resources/Becker%20Report.pdf.

Burns M. Ysseldyke J. (2009). Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 3–11. doi: 10.1177/0022466908315563.

Bursuck W. L. Damer M. (2007). Reading instruction for students who are at risk or have disabilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Buzhardt J. Greenwood C. R. Abbott M. Tapia Y. (2007). Scaling up classwide peer tutoring: Investigating barriers to wide-scale implementation from a distance. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5, 75–96.

Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence. A user-friendly guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigorousevid/rigorousevid.pdf.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2008). Classifying the state of evidence for special education professional practices: CEC practice study manual. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/Content/NavigationMenu/ProfessionalDevelopment/ProfessionalStandards/Practice_Studies_Manual_1_25.pdf.

Foegen A. Jiban C. Deno S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 41, 121–139. doi: 10.1177/00224669070410020101.

Furtak E. M. Ruiz-Primo M. A. Shemwell J. T. Ayala C. C. Brandon P. R. Shavelson R. J. Yin Y. (2008). On the fidelity of implementing embedded formative assessments and its relation to student learning. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 360–389.

Gagnon J. C. MacCini P. (2007). Teacher-reported use of empirically validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 43–56. doi: 10.1177/07419325070280010501.

Greenwood C. R. Abbott M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276–289. doi: 10.1177/088840640102400403.

Horner R. H. Carr E. G. Halle J. McGee G. Odom S. Wolery M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2008).

Institute for Education Sciences. (2007). Intervention: Peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/reports/beginning_reading/pals/.

Kay R. Knaack L. Petrarca D. (2009). Exploring teachers perceptions of web-based learning tools. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 5. Retrieved from http://ijklo.org/Volume5/IJELLOv5p027-050Kay649.pdf.

Kovaleski J. F. Gickling E. E. Morrow H. Swank P. R. (1999). High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 170–183. doi: 10.1177/074193259902000308.

Kretlow A. G. Bartholomew C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279–299. doi: 10.1177/0888406410371643.

MacCini P. Gagnon J. C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72, 217–234.

Maheady L. Harper G. F. Mallette B. (2003). Class wide peer tutoring: Go for it. Current Practice Alerts, 8. Retrieved from http://www.teachingld.org/pdf/PeerTutoring_rev1.pdf.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2005, March). Computer technology in the public school classroom: Teacher perspectives (Issue Brief NCES 2005–083).

Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2005083.

National Reading Panel. (2006). Teaching children to read—Summary report of the NRP. Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 6401 et seq. (2006).

Odom S. L. Brantlinger E. Gersten R. Horner R. H. Thompson B. Harris K. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.

Ohlund B. Andrews S. Yu C. H. Jannasch-Pennell A. Diangi S. A. (1999, April). Impact of asynchronous and synchronous internet based communication on the collaboration and performance among K-12 teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

Promising Practices Network. (2009). Programs that work: Class-wide peer tutoring. Retrieved from http://www.promisingpractices.net/program.asp?programid=99#findings.

Schumaker J. B. Bulgren J. A. Davis B. Grossen B. Marquis J. Deshler D. D. Lenz B. K. (2002). The educational context and outcomes for students with disabilities: General education classes and the satisfaction of general education teachers. Research report. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Institute for Academic Access. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/PDFS/ED469285.pdf.

Stanovich P. J. Stanovich K. E. (2003). Using research and reason in education: How teachers can use scientifically based research to make curricular and instructional decisions. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved from http://www.sde.state.ok.us/Programs/ReadingFirst/resources/Stanovich_Color.pdf.

Stecker P. M. Lembke E. S. Foegen A. (2008). Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making. Preventing School Failure, 52, 48–58. doi: 10.3200/PSFL.52.2.48-58.

Stein M. L. Berends M. Fuchs D. McMaster K. Saenz L. Loulee Y. Compton D. L. (2008). Scaling up an early reading program: Relationships among teacher support, fidelity of implementation, and student performance across different sites and years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 368–388. doi: 10.3102/0162373708322738.

Thompson B. Diamond K. E. McWilliam R. Snyder P. Snyder S. W. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research. Exceptional Children, 71, 181–194.

Wanzek J. Vaughn S. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 151–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00289.x.

Wayman M. Wallace T. Wiley H. Tichá R. Espin C. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120. doi: 10.1177/00224669070410020401.

Williams D. Coles L. (2007). Teachers' approaches to finding and using research evidence: An information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49, 185–206. doi: 10.1080/00131880701369719.

Woodcock R. W. McGrew K. S. Mather N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.