Anderson-InmanL. A.HorneyM. A. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 153–160. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.42.1.8.
2.
DayS.EdwardsB. (1996). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 486–492. doi: 10.1177/002221949602900503.
3.
EdyburnD. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32, 2–24.
4.
EdyburnD. (2003a). 2002 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 5–19.
5.
EdyburnD. (2003b). Learning from text. Special Education Technology Practice, 5, 16–27.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (2008).
8.
MacArthurC. A.FerrettiR. P.OkoloC. M.CavalierA. R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. Elementary School Journal, 101, 273–301. doi: 10.1086/499669.
9.
MontaliJ.LewandowskiL. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271–279. doi: 10.1177/002221949602900305.
10.
Silver-PacuillaH.RuedelK.MistrettS. (2004). A review of technology-based approaches for reading instruction: Tools for researchers and vendors. Buffalo, NY: The National Centre for Technology Innovation.