CaccamiseD.SnyderL. (2005). Theory and pedagogical practices of text comprehension. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 5–20.
2.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. F.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
3.
GajriaM.JitendraA. K.SoodS.SacksG. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225.
4.
GathercoleS. E.AllowayT. P.WillisC.AdamsA. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 265–281.
5.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.
6.
HagamanJ. L.CaseyK. J.ReidR. (in press). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of young students. Remedial and Special Education.
7.
HagamanJ. L.ReidR. (2008). The effects of the paraphrasing strategy on the reading comprehension of middle school students at risk for failure in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 222–234.
8.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
9.
KatimsD. S.HarrisS. (1997). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students in inclusive classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41, 116–123.
10.
MeisingerE. B.BradleyB. A.SchwanenflugelP. J.KuhnM. R.MorrisR. D. (2009). Myth and reality of the word caller: The relation between teacher nominations and prevalence among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 147–159.
11.
MillerW. H. (1993). Complete reading disabilities handbook: Ready-to-use techniques for teaching reading disabled students. New York, NY: Center for Applied Research in Education.
12.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and U.S. Department of Education.
13.
PressleyM.BrownR.El-DinaryP. B.AllferbachP. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 215–224.
14.
ReidR.LienemannT. O. (2006). Strategy instruction for children with learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
SchumakerJ. B.DentonP. H.DeshlerD. D. (1984). The paraphrasing strategy. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
16.
ShankweilerD.LundquistE.DreyerL. G.DickinsonC. C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 267–294.
17.
SwansonH. L.HowardC. B.SaezL. (2007). Reading comprehension and working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading. In CainK.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 157–185). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (n.d.) Cognitive strategy instruction. Retrieved from http://www.unl.edu/csi/.
19.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). National assessment of educational progress (NAEP). Washington, DC: Author.
20.
VaughnS.LevyS.ColemanM.BosC. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observation studies. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 2–13.