The Legal Meaning of Specific Learning Disability for Special Education Eligibility

Anchorage Sch. Dist., 54 IDELR ¶ 67 (Alaska SEA 2010).

Austin Indep. Sch. Dist., 53 IDELR ¶ 310 (Tex. SEA 2009).

Bd. of Educ. of Ossining Union Free Sch. Dist., 46 IDELR ¶ 180 (N. Y. SEA 2006).

Brendan K. v. Easton Area Sch. Dist., 47 IDELR ¶ 249 (E. D. Pa. 2007).

CAL. CODE REGS. tit. 5, §§ 3001 et seq. (2008).

CAL. EDUC. CODE § 56337 (2008).

Centennial Sch. Dist., 46 IDELR ¶ 55 (Pa. SEA 2006).

Chase v. Mesa County Sch. Dist. No. 51, 53 IDELR ¶ 72 (D. Colo. 2009).

Chico Unified Sch. Dist., 52 IDELR ¶ 90 (Cal. SEA 2009).

Crawford v. Honig, 37 F.3d 485 (9th Cir. 1994).

Dep't of Educ. v. L.K., 46 IDELR ¶ 36 (D. Hawaii 2006).

E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 53 IDELR ¶ 41 (N.D. Cal. 2009).

Elk Grove Unified Sch. Dist., 46 IDELR ¶ 56 (Cal. SEA 2006).

Golden D. (2007, July 24). Schools beat back demands for special-ed services. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.

Haddon Heights Sch. Dist., 52 IDELR ¶ 238 (N.J. SEA 2009).

High Tech Middle Media Arts Sch., 47 IDELR ¶ 114 (Cal. SEA 2007).

Hood v. Encinitas Union Sch. Dist., 486 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2007).

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act regulations, 34 C.F.R. Part 300 (2008).

Jaffess v. Council Rock Sch. Dist., 46 IDELR ¶ 246 (E.D. Pa. 2006).

Jefferson County Bd. of Educ., 49 IDELR ¶ 57 (Ala. SEA 2007).

Larry P. v. Riles, 793 F.2d 969 (9th Cir. 1986).

M.P. v. Santa Monica-Malibu Unified Sch. Dist., 633 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (C.D. Cal. 2008).

Nguyen v. Dist. of Columbia, 2010 WL 354630 (D.D.C. 2010).

Pencader Charter Sch., 50 IDELR ¶ 299 (Del. SEA 2008).

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics. (2009). Annual compendium of disability statistics. New York, NY: Hunter College. Available at http://neweditionsnet/stats/rrtc/Compendium/sect3-2.htm.

S. v. Wissahickon Sch. Dist., 50 IDELR ¶ 216 (E.D. Pa. 2008), aff'd on other grounds sub nom. Richard S. v. Wissahickon Sch. Dist., 334 F. App'x 508 (2d Cir. 2009).

S. Orange-Maplewood Bd. of Educ., 53 IDELR ¶ 134 (N.J. SEA 2009).

Strock v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 281, 49 IDELR ¶ 216 (D. Minn. 2008).

Victor Elementary Sch. Dist., 50 IDELR ¶ 204 (Cal. SEA 2008).

W.H. ex rel. B.H. v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist., 52 IDELR ¶ 252 (E.D. Cal. 2009), stay denied, 53 IDELR ¶ 121 (E.D. Cal. 2009).

Williamson County Bd. of Educ. v. C.K., 52 IDELR ¶ 40 (M.D. Tenn. 2009).

Zirkel P. A. (2006). The legal meaning of specific learning disability for special education eligibility. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Zirkel P. A. Gischlar K. (2008). Due process hearings under the IDEA: A longitudinal frequency analysis. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21, 22–31.

Zirkel P. A. Scala G. (in press). Due process hearing systems under the IDEA: A state-by-state survey. Journal of Disability Policy Studies.

Zirkel P. A. Thomas L. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56–63.