Accelerated Math [Computer software]. (1999). Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
2.
ArterJ.JenkinsJ. (1979). Differential diagnosis—Prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–556.
3.
BatscheG.KavaleK. A.KovaleskiJ. F. (2006). Competing views: A dialogue on response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 6–19.
4.
BoltD. M.YsseldykeJ. E.PattersonM. J. (in press). Students, teachers, and schools as sources of variability, integrity and sustainability in implementing progress monitoring. School Psychology Review.
5.
Bradley-JohnsonS.LesiakJ. L. (1989). Problems in written expression: Assessment and remediation. New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
BurnsM. K. (2007). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 297–313.
7.
BurnsM. K.DenoS. L.JimersonS. R. (2007). Toward a unified response-to-intervention model. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 428–440). New York, NY: Springer.
8.
BurnsM. K.JacobS.WagnerA. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 263–279.
9.
BurnsM. K.MacQuarrieL. L.CampbellD. T. (1999). The difference between curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement: A focus on purpose and result. Communiqué, 27, 18–19.
10.
BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (2006). Using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 3–5.
11.
BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M.BoiceC. H. (2008). Best practices in delivering intensive academic interventions for individual students. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed, pp. 1151–1162.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
12.
CharlesworthR.FleegeP. O.WeitmanC. J. (1994). Research on the effects of group standardization testing on instruction, pupils, and teachers: New direction for policy. Early Education and Development, 5, 195–212.
13.
ChristT. J. (2006). Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review, 35, 128–133.
14.
CromwellR.BlashfieldR.StraussJ. (1975). Criteria for classification systems. In HobbsN. (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children (pp. 4–25). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
CronbachL.SnowR. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York, NY: Irvington.
16.
DeanV. J.BurnsM. K. (2002). Inclusion of intrinsic processing difficulties in LD diagnostic models: A critical review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 170–176.
17.
DeanV. J.BurnsM. K.GrialouT.VarroP. J. (2006). Comparison of ecological validity of learning disabilities diagnostic models. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 157–168.
18.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
19.
ElliottS. N.FuchsL. S. (1997). The utility of curriculum-based measurement and performance assessment as alternatives to traditional intelligence and achievement tests. School Psychology Review, 26, 224–233.
20.
FuchsL. S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 172–186.
21.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
22.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204–219.
23.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.BurchM.HamlettC. L.OwenJancekD. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 293–305.
24.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. The LEA series on special education and disability (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
HaleJ.NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanA. S.KavaleK.A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 58, 6–13.
26.
Heartland Area Education Agency. (2002). Improving children's educational results through data-based decision making. Johnston, IA: Author.
27.
HospJ. L. (2008). Best practices in aligning academic assessment with instruction. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., pp. 363–376). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
28.
HowellK. W.HospJ. L.KurnsS. (2008). Best practices in curriculum-based evaluation. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., pp. 349–362). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
29.
IDEA Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 (2006).
30.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C, §§ 1400 et seq. (2008).
31.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (1999). Effectiveness of special education. In ReynoldsC. R.GutkinT. B. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 984–1024). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In GerstenR.SchillerE. P.VaughnS. (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Synthesis of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues, (pp. 281–326). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
LindsleyO. R. (1964). Direct measurement and prosthesis of retarded behavior. Journal of Education, 147, 62–81.
34.
MartensB. K.SteeleE. S.MassieD. R.DiskinM. T. (1995). Curriculum-bias in standardized tests of reading decoding. Journal of School Psychology, 33, 287–296.
35.
MarzanoR. (2003). Two wrongs and a right. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 56–60.
36.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2003). Technical manual for the NWEA measures of academic progress and achievement level tests. Lake Oswego, OR: Author.
37.
ReschlyD. J. (1996). Functional assessments and special education decision making. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education: Divergent perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 115–128). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
ReschlyD. J.YsseldykeJ. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 3–21). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
39.
SalviaJ.YsseldykeJ.BoltS. (2010). Assessment: In special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
40.
ShapiroE. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
41.
ShepardL. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.
42.
SimosP. G.FletcherJ. M.BergmanE.BreierJ. I.FoormanB. R.CastilloE. M.PapanicolaouA. C. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203–1213.
43.
SomekiF.BurnsM. K. (2009). Methods for measuring student response to stimulant medication: A meta-analytic review. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 388–396.
44.
StageS. A.QuirozD. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive classroom behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
45.
STAR Early Literacy [Computer software]. (2004). Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.
46.
SteinhausenH. C.ReitzleM. (1996). The validity of mixed disorders of conduct and emotions in children and adolescents: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 339–344.
47.
StigginsR. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324–328.
48.
SwansonH. L.HowardC. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification?. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 17–34.
49.
TillyW. D.III. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem solving and the three-tiered model. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (5th ed., pp. 17–36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
50.
VanDerHeydenA. M.BurnsM. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment and curriculum-based measurement to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(3), 15–29.
51.
WittJ. C.DalyE. M.NoellG. (2000). Functional assessments: A step-by-step guide to solving academic and behavior problems. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
52.
Yearly Progress Pro [Computer software]. (2004). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Digital Learning.
53.
YsseldykeJ. (1973). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: The search for aptitude-treatment interactions. In MannL.SabatinoD. (Eds), The first review of special education (pp. 1–37). New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
54.
YsseldykeJ. (2006, April). Using continuous progress monitoring data to make accountability decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Anaheim, CA.
55.
YsseldykeJ.BoltD. (2007). Effect of technology-enhanced continuous progress monitoring on math achievement. School Psychology Review, 36, 453–467.
56.
YsseldykeJ.SalviaJ. (1974). Diagnostic-prescriptive teaching: Two models. Exceptional Children, 41, 181–186.
57.
YsseldykeJ. E.ChristensonS. L. (2002). Functional assessment of academic behavior. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
58.
YsseldykeJ. E.McLeodS. (2007). Using technology tools to monitor response to intervention. In JimersonS.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 396–407). New York, NY: Springer.