BarnettD. W.ElliottN.GradenJ.IhioT.MacMannG.NantaisM. (2006). Technical adequacy for response to intervention practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 20–31.
3.
BerkeleyS.BenderW. N.PeasterL. G.SaundersL. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95.
4.
Bethlehem Area Sch. Dist. v. Zhou, 976 A.2d 1284 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2009).
5.
BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BurnsM.JacobS.WagnerA. R. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response to intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 263–279.
7.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C.DyndaA. M. (2006). Integration of response to intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the tower of Babel. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 807–825.
8.
FletcherJ. M.CoulterW. A.ReschlyD. J.VaughanS. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 304–331.
9.
FletcherJ. M.ReschlyD. J. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of perpetuating old ideas. The School Psychologist, 59(1), 10–15.
10.
FuchsD.DeshlerD. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 129–136.
11.
GerberM. M. (2005). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 516–524.
12.
GreshamF. M.ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D.FletcherJ.BurnsM.ChristT. (2005). Comprehensive evaluation of learning disabilities: A response to intervention perspective. The School Psychologist, 59(1), 26–30.
13.
HaleJ. B.KaufmanA.NaglieriJ. A.KavaleK.A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment models. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753–770.
14.
HaleJ. B.NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanA. S.KavaleK. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 58(1), 6–13, 29.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401 et seq. (2008).
17.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act regulations. 34 C.F.R. Part 300 (2008).
18.
KavaleK. (2005). Identifying specific learning disability: Is responsiveness to intervention the answer?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 553–562.
19.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239–256.
20.
KavaleK. A.KaufmanA. S.NaglieriJ. A.HaleJ. B. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of poorly supported ideas. The School Psychologist, 59(1), 16–25.
21.
Letter to Zirkel, 48 IDELR ¶ 192 (OSEP 2007).
22.
Letter to Zirkel, 50 IDELR ¶ 49 (OSEP 2008).
23.
MercerC. D.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.MercerA. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 213–232.
ReschlyD. J.HospJ. L. (2004). State SLD identification policies and practices,. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 197–213.
27.
SchrankF. A.TeglasiH.WolfI. L.MillerJ. A.CaterinoL. C.ReynoldsC. R. (2005). American Academy of School Psychology reply to response-to-intervention perspective. The School Psychologist, 59(1), 30–33.
28.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 25, 155–168.
29.
ZirkelP.KrohnN. (2008). RTI after IDEA: A survey of state laws. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 40(3), 71–73.
30.
ZirkelP. A. (2003). Do OSEP policy letters have legal weight?. West's Education Law Reporter, 171, 391–396.
31.
ZirkelP. A. (2006). Response to intercontention: A legal discrepancy analysis. The School Psychologist, 60(3), 118–122.
32.
ZirkelP. A. (2007). The legal meaning of specific learning disability for special education eligibility. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.