AboundF. E.MendelsonM. J. (1998). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: Developmental perspectives. In BukowskiW. M.NewcombA. F.HartupW. W. (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 87–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BeckA. (2005). A place for critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48, 392–400.
3.
BukowskiW.NewcombA. F.HartupW. W. (Eds.). (1998). The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CallowJ. (2008). Show me: Principles for assessing students' visual literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 61 (8), 616–626.
5.
De CorteE. (2003). Transfer of the productive use of acquired knowledge, skills, and motivation. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 12, 255–263.
6.
EvansI. M.SalisburyC. L.PalombaroM. M.BerrymanJ.HollowoodT. M. (1992). Peer interactions and social acceptance of elementary-age children with severe disabilities in an inclusive school. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 205–212.
7.
HardmanM. L.DrewC. J.EaganM. W. (2006). Human exceptionality: School, community, and family, IDEA 2004 update edition (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
JanksH. (2000). Domination, access, diversity, and design: A synthesis for critical literacy education. Educational Review, 52, 175–186.
9.
KlaczynskiP. A.NarasimhamG. (1998). Development of scientific reasoning biases: Cognitive versus ego-protective explanations. Developmental Psychology, 34, 175–187.
10.
LynneS. D.GraberJ. A.NicholsT. R.Brooks-GunnJ.BotvinG. J. (2007). Links between pubertal timing, peer influences, and externalizing behaviors among urban students followed through middle school. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 181e7–181e13.
New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In CopeB.KalantizM. (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). London: Routledge.
13.
PaulR.ElderL. (2007). How to improve student learning: 30 practical ideas. Berkeley, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
14.
RoseG. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
SchaeferL. M. (2008). Some kids use wheelchairs (understanding differences). New York: Capstone Press.
17.
TalbotM. (2002, February 24). Girls just want to be mean. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 24–29.
18.
YenawineP. (1997). Thoughts on visual literacy. In FloodJ.HeathS. B.LappD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 845–846). New York: MacMillan Reference Books.