BenzM.YovanoffP.DorenB. (1997). School-to-work components that predict postschool success for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 155–165.
2.
Blue-BanningM. J.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167–184.
3.
BreihanA. W. (2007). Who chooses service providers? The spread of consumer choice, 1992–2004. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 365–372.
4.
CaldwellJ. (2006). Consumer-directed supports: Economic, health, and social outcomes for families. Mental Retardation, 44, 405–417.
5.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
EversonJ.ZhangD. (2000). Person-centered planning: Characteristics, inhibitors and supports. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 36–43.
7.
EversonJ. M.MoonM. S. (1987). Transition services for young adults with severe disabilities: Defining professional and parental roles and responsibilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 87–95.
8.
FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.JonesD. (1988). Generations of hope: Parental perspectives on the transition of their children with severe retardation from school to adult life. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 177–187.
9.
GeenanS.PowersL. E.Lopez-VasquezA. (2001). Multicultural aspects of parent involvement in transition. Exceptional Children, 67, 265–282.
10.
Hanley-MaxwellC.PogoloffS. M.Whitney-ThomasJ. (1998). Families: The heart of transition. In RuschF. R.Chadsey-RuschJ. (Eds.), Beyond high school: Transition from school to work (pp. 234–264). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
Hanley-MaxwellC.Whitney-ThomasJ.PogoloffS. (1995). The second shock: A qualitative study of parents' perspectives and needs during their child's transition from school to adult life. Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20 (1), 3–15.
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 to 1482 (1974).
13.
JohnsonD. R.StoddenR. A.EmanuelE. J.LueckingR.MackM. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transition: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68, 519–531.
14.
Kochhar-BryantC. A.GreeneG. A. (2009). Pathways for successful transition for youth with disabilities: A developmental process. Columbus, OH: Allyn & Bacon/Merrill.
15.
KreiderH.CaspeM.KennedyS.WeissH. (2007). Family involvement in middle and high school students' education. Involvement makes a difference: Evidence that family involvement promotes school success for every child of every age. Cambridge: MA: Harvard Family Research Project. Harvard University.
16.
LandAdamL. J.ZhangD. D.MontoyaL. (2007). Culturally diverse parents' experiences in their children's transition: Knowledge and involvement. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 30, 68–79.
17.
LueckingR.FabianE. (2000). Paid internships and employment success for youth in transition. Career Development for Exceptional Children, 23, 205–221.
18.
LustigD. C. (2002). Family coping in families with a child with a disability. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 14–22.
19.
MarquesJ. F.McCallC. (2005). The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 10, 439–462.
20.
MarshallC.RossmanG. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MorningstarM. E.TurnbullA. P.TurnbullH. R. (1996). What do students with disabilities tell us about the importance of family involvement in the transition from school to adult life?. Exceptional Children, 62, 249–260.
23.
MyersM. (2000). Qualitative research and the generalizability question: Standing firm with proteus. The Qualitative Report, 4 (3/4), Retrieved December 5, 2009, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/myers.html.
24.
Neely-BarnesS.GraffC.MarcenkoM.WeberL. (2008). Family decision making: Benefits to persons with developmental disabilities and their family members. Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 46, 93–105.
25.
NewmanL. (2004). Family involvement in the educational development of youth with disabilities. A special topic report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS-2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
26.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub. L. No. 107–110,115 Stat. 1425 (2001).
27.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
PenickN. I.JepsenD. A. (1992). Family functioning and adolescent career development. Career Development Quarterly, 40, 208–222.
29.
RuedaR.MonzoL.ShapiroJ.GomezJ.BlacherJ. (2005). Cultural models and practices regarding transition: A view from Latina mothers of young adults with developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71, 401–414.
30.
TurnbullA.TurnbullH. (1990). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
31.
TurnbullA.TurnbullR. (2001). Families, professionals, and exceptionalities: Collaborating for empowerment (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
32.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS-2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
33.
WhistonS. C.KellerB. (2004). The influence of family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493–568.
34.
Whitney-ThomasJ.Hanley-MaxwellC. (1996). Packing the parachute: Parents' experiences as their children prepare to leave high school. Exceptional Children, 63, 75–87.
35.
WittenburgD.MaagE. (2002). School to where? A literature review on economic outcomes of youth with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 265–280.