Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alston v. Dist. of Columbia, 561 F. Supp. 2d 29 (D.D.C. 2008 ).
2.American Psychiatric Association. (2000 ). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. rev. ). Washington, DC : Author .
3.
Holler
R.
Zirkel
P. A.
(2008a ). Legally best practices in Section 504 plans . School Administrator , 65 (8 ), 38 –40 .
4.
Holler
R.
Zirkel
P. A.
(2008b ). Section 504 and public schools: A national survey concerning “Section 504-only” students . NASSP Bulletin , 92 , 19 –43 .
5.
K.M. ex rel. D.G. v. Hyde Park Cent. Sch. Dist., 381 F. Supp. 2d 343 (S.D.N.Y. 2005 ).
6.
Letter to McKethan, 25 IDELR 295 (OCR 1996 ).
7.
M.M.R.-Z. v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 528 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2008 ).
8.
Mark H. v. LeMahieu, 513 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2008 ).
9.
Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999 ).
10.
Toyota Motor Mfg. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002 ).
11.
Zirkel
P. A.
(2003 ). Conducting legally defensible §504/ADA eligibility determinations . West's Education Law Reporter , 176 , 1 –11 .
12.
Zirkel
P. A.
(2004 ). Section 504, the ADA, and the schools . Horsham, PA : LRP Publications .
13.
Zirkel
P. A.
(in press). §504/ADA eligibility determinations: An update . West's Education Law Reporter .
