Using Technology to Create and Administer Accessible Tests

Abell M. Bauder D. Simmons T. (2004). Universally designed online assessment: Implications for the future. Information Technology and Disabilities, 10(1). Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.rit.edu/∼easi/itd/itdv10n1/abell.htm.

Acrey C. Johnstone C. Milligan C. (2005). Using universal design to unlock the potential for academic achievement of at-risk learners. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(2), 22–31.

Barlow C. L. Wetherill K. S. (2005). Technology + imagination = results. T.H.E. Journal, 33, 20–22, 24, 26. Retrieved May 30, 2007, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/17431_1.

Beddow P. A. Kettler R. J. Elliott S. N. (2008). TAMI: Test accessibility and modification inventory. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/TAMI.xml.

Bennett D. E. Zentall S. S. French B. F. Giorgetti-Borucki K. (2006). The effects of computer administered choice on students with and without characteristics of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 189–203.

Bouck E. C. (2006). Online assessments in the content areas: What are they good for? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 67–73.

Dolan R. P. Hall T. E. Banerjee M. Chun S. Strangman N. (2005). Applying principles of universal design to test delivery: The effect of computer-based read-aloud on test performance of high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(7). Available from http://www.jtla.org.

Edyburn D. L. (2003). Technology in special education. In Roblyer M. D. (Ed.), Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315–333). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Fitzgerald M. (2008, January 27). The coming wave of gadgets that listen and obey. New York Times, p. BU 4.

Hasselbring T. S. Bausch M. E. (2006). Assistive technologies for reading. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 72–75.

Hoffman B. Hartley K. Boone R. (2005). Reaching accessibility: Guidelines for creating and refining digital learning materials. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40, 171–176.

Hopkins J. (2006). All students being equal. Technology and Learning, 26(10), 26–28.

Hughes C. A. (1996). Memory and test-taking strategies. In Deshler D. D. Ellis E. S. Lenz B. K. (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed., pp. 209–266). Denver, CO: Love.

Kalyanpur M. Kirmani M. H. (2005). Diversity and technology: Classroom implications for the digital divide. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 9–18.

Ketterlin-Geller L. R. Yovanoff P. Tindal G. (2007). Developing a new paradigm for conducting research on accommodations in mathematics testing. Exceptional Children, 73, 331–347.

Lenz B. K. (2006). Creating school-wide conditions for high-quality learning strategy classroom instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 261–266.

Lindstrom J. H. (2007). Determining appropriate accommodations for postsecondary students with reading and written expression disorders. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(4), 229–236.

McGuire J. M. Scott S. S. Shaw S. F. (2006). Universal design and its applications in educational environments. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 166–175.

Mounce A. B. (2008). Teaching content with interactive whiteboards. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), 54–58.

Ozden M. Y. Erturk I. Sanli R. (2004). Students' perception of online assessment: A case study. Journal of Distance Education, 19, 77–93.

Parette H. P. Wojcik B. W. Peterson-Karlan G. Hourcade J. J. (2005). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: What's cool and what's not. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 320–331.

Salend S. J. (2008). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Salend S. J. (in press). Inclusive classroom-based testing and assessment practices: Supporting student learning and informing instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Shaffer D. W. (2007). Epistemic games as career preparatory experiences for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(3), 57–68.

Sireci S. Scarpati S. Li S. , (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490.

Skylar A. A. (2007). Assistive techology: Section 508: Web accessibility for people with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 22(4), 57–62.

Sopko K. M. (2008). Universal design for learning: Implementation in six local education agencies. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Stock S. E. Davies D. K. Wehmeyer M. L. (2004). Internet-based multimedia tests and surveys for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 43–47.

Strobel W. Arthanat S. Fossa J. Mistrett S. Brace J. (2006). The industry profile on education technology: Learning disabilities technologies and markets. Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://cosmos.buffalo.edu/t2rerc/pubs/ip/ET/index.htm.

Thompson J. R. Bakken J. P. Fulk B. M. Peterson-Karlan G. (2005). Using technology to improve the literacy skills of students with disabilities. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

Thompson S. J. Quenemoen R. F. Thurlow M. L. , (2006). Factors to consider in the design of inclusive online assessments. In Hricko M. Howell S. L. (Eds.), Online assessment and measurement: Foundations and challenges (pp. 102–117). Hershey, PA: Information Sciences.

van Garderen D. Whittaker C. (2006). Planning differentiated multicultural instruction for secondary inclusive classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 12–20.

Villano M. (2006). Classroom management software. Technology and Learning, 26(10), 8–12.

Wissick C. A. (2005). Written language: When to consider technology. Technology in Action, 1(6), 1–12.

Zorfass J. M. Fideler E. F. Clay K. Brann A. (2007, May). Enhancing content literacy: Software tools help struggling students. Technology in Action, 2(6), 1–12.