Alber-MorganS. R.HesslerT.KonradM. (2007). Teaching writing for keeps. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(3), 107–128.
2.
Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children With Disabilities; Final Rule, Fed. Reg., pt. 2, 46540–46845 (2006).
3.
BinderC. (2003). Doesn't everybody need fluency?Performance Improvement, 42(3), 14–20.
4.
CrawfordL.TindalG.StieberS. (2001). Using oral reading rate to predict student performance on statewide assessment tests. Educational Assessment, 7(4), 303–323.
5.
DenoS. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
6.
DenoS. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
7.
DenoS. L.MarstonD.MirkinP. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
8.
EspinC. A.ScierkaB. J.SkareS.HalversonN. (1999). Criterion-related validity of curriculum-based measures in writing for secondary school students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14, 5–27.
9.
EspinC. A.ShinJ.DenoS. L.SkareS.RobinsonS.BennerB. (2000). Identifying indicators of written expression proficiency for middle school students. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 140–153.
10.
EtscheidtS. K. (2006). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP teams. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 55–60.
11.
FuchsD.DeshlerD. D. (2007). What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask). Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(2), 129–136.
12.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.DenoS. L. (1985). The importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52, 63–71.
13.
GansleK. A.NoellG. H.VanDerHeydenA. M.NaquinG. M.SliderN. J. (2002). Moving beyond total words written: The reliability, criterion validity, and time cost of alternative measures for curriculum-based measurement in writing. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 477–497.
14.
GansleK. A.NoellG. H.VanDerHeydenA. M.SliderN. J.HoffpauirL. D.WhitmarshE. L. (2004). An examination of the criterion validity and sensitivity to brief intervention of alternate curriculum-based measures of writing skill. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 291–300.
15.
HewardW. L. (2008). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
16.
HospM. K.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement.New York: Guilford.
17.
JohnsonE.MellardD. F.FuchsD.McKnightM. A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it.Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
18.
KaminskiR. A.GoodR. H.III. (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 113–142). New York: Guilford.
19.
Kasper-FergusonS.MoxleyR. A. (2002). Developing a writing package with student graphing of fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 25(2), 249–267.
20.
KonradM. (2008). Twenty ways to involve students in the IEP process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 43, 236–239.
21.
MarstonD. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York: Guilford.
22.
MinnerS.PraterG.SullavanC.GwaltneyW. (1989). Informal assessment of written expression. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 21(2), 76–79.
23.
ParkerR.TindalG.HasbrouckJ. (1991). Countable indices of writing quality: Their suitability for screening-eligibility decisions. Exceptionality, 2, 1–17.
24.
Powell-SmithK. A.ShinnM. R. (2004). Administration and scoring of written expression curriculum-based measurement (WE-CBM) for use in general outcome measurement.Eden Prairie, MN: EdFormation.
StotzK. E.ItoiM.KonradM.Alber-MorganS. R. (2008). Effects of self-graphing on written expression of fourth grade students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 172–186.
27.
VideenJ.DenoS.L.MarstonD. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of writing proficiency in written expression (Research Rep. No. 84). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
YsseldykeJ.BettsJ.ThillT.HanniganE. (2004). Use of an instructional management system to improve mathematics skills for students in Title I programs. Preventing School Failure, 48(4), 10–14.
30.
ZirkelP. A. (2006). SLD eligibility: A users' guide to the new regulations.Lawrence, KS: National Research on Learning Disabilities.