What Does the Law Say?

Alexis v. Bd. of Educ., 286 F. Supp. 2d 551 (D. Md. 2003).

Bd. of Educ. v. L. M., 478 F.3d 307 (6th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 693 (2007).

Catalan v. Dist. of Columbia, 478 F. Supp. 2d 73 (D.D.C. 2007).

E. Penn Sch. Dist. v. Scott B., 29 IDELR 1058 (E.D. Pa. 1999).

Heather D. v. Northampton Area Sch. Dist., 511 F. Supp. 2d 549 (E.D. Pa. 2007).

Holler R. A. Zirkel P.A. (in press). Section 504 legally best practices: Avoid the “consolation prize” mentality. School Administrator.

Iapalucci v. Dist. of Columbia, 402 F. Supp. 2d 152 (D.D.C. 2005).

IDEA regulations, 34 C.F.R. Part 300 (2007).

Keystone Cent. Sch. Dist. v. E. E., 438 F. Supp. 2d 519 (E.D. Pa. 2006).

Leighty v. Laurel Sch. Dist., 457 F. Supp. 2d 546 (E.D. Pa. 2006).

Leticia H. v. Ysleta Indep. Sch. Dist., 502 F. Supp. 2d 512 (W.D. Tex. 2007).

Letter to Trader, 48 IDELR ¶ 2 (OSEP 2006).

Nack v. Orange City Sch. Dist., 454 F.3d 604 (6th Cir. 2006).

Neal D. Kirp D. (1985). The allure of legalization reconsidered: The case of special education. Law and Contemporary Problems, 48, 63–87.

O'Dell v. Special Sch. Dist., 503 F. Supp. 2d 1206 (E.D. Mo. 2007).

Park v. Anaheim Union High Sch. Dist., 464 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2006).

Rose T. Zirkel P.A. (2007). Orton-Gillingham methodology for students with reading disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 171–185.

Smith v. Guilford Bd. of Educ., 226 Fed. Appx. 58 (2d Cir. 2007).

Van Duyn v. Baker Sch. Dist. 5J, 481 F.3d 770 (9th Cir. 2007).

Zirkel P. A. (2007). The legal meaning of specific learning disability for special education eligibility. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Zirkel P. A. Fossey R. (2005). Liability for student suicide. West's Education Law Reporter, 197, 489–497.