AbnerG. H.LahmE. A. (1998). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers' readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 92(2), 98–105.
2.
AultM. J. (2006, March 22). The National Assistive Technology Research Institute's “top ten” list of findings. Paper presented at the 2006 California Sate University — Northridge Center on Disabilities Conference. Retrieved January 5, 2008, from http://natri.uky.edu/findings/presentations/presmenu.html.
3.
BauschM. E.AultM. J.HasselbringT. S. (2006). Assistive technology planner: From IEP consideration to classroom implementation.Lexington, KY: National Assistive Technology Research Institute.
4.
BauschM. E.EvmenovaA.BehrmannM.AultM. J. (2007). Going beyond assistive technology devices: Are assistive technology services being considered? Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
GerstenR.BakerS. (1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65, 23–36.
6.
HutingerP. L.JohansonJ. (2000). Implementing and maintaining an effective early childhood comprehensive technology system. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(3), 159–173.
7.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 118, Stat. 2647 et seq., § 1401 (2004).
8.
KerrM. M.NelsonC. M. (2002). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
9.
LahmE. A.BauschM. E.HasselbringT. S.BlackhurstA. E. (2001). National assistive technology research institute. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(3), 19–26.
10.
MercerC. D.MercerA. R. (2005). Teaching students with learning problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
11.
MistrettS.RuffinoA.LaneS.RobinsonL.ReedP.MilbourneS. (n.d.). TAM technology fan: Supports for young children.Arlington, VA: Technology and Media Division of the Council for Exceptional Children.
12.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J. (2004). Family-centered and culturally responsive assistive technology decision-making. Infants and Young Children, 17, 355–367.
13.
ParetteH. P.VanBiervlietA.HourcadeJ. J. (2000). Family-centered decision-making in assistive technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 45–55.
14.
PetersonL.McLaughlinT.WeberK.AndersonH. (2008). The effects of model, lead, and test technique with visual prompts paired with a fading procedure to teach “where” to a 13-year-old echolalic boy with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 20, 31–39.
The QIAT Consortium. (2004). Quality indicators for assistive technology services: Research-based revision, 2004. Retrieved May 25, 2007, from http://sweb.uky.edu/∼jszaba0/QIAT.html.
17.
Technology and Media Division of the Council for Exceptional Children and the Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. (n.d.). Assistive technology consideration quick wheel.Arlington, VA: Author.
18.
TindalG. A.MarstonD. B. (1990). Classroom-based assessment: Evaluating instructional outcomes.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.