BoulterL. (2004). Family—school connection and school violence prevention. The Negro Educational Review, 55(1), 27–40.
2.
BradshawC. (2006, July). Project Target: An evaluation of PBIS in Maryland. Presentation at meeting of OSEP Project Directors, Baltimore, MD.
3.
BrendtroL. K.BrokenlegM.Van BockernS. (1990). Reclaiming youth at risk: Our hope for the future.Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
4.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2005). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
ChristensonS. L.SheridanS. M. (2001). Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning.New York: Guilford Press.
6.
DeslandesR.BertrandR. (2005). Motivation of parent involvement in secondary-level schooling. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 164–175.
7.
EpsteinJ. L. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8.
EpsteinJ. L.SandersM. G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120.
9.
HendersonA.JohnsonV.MappK.DaviesD. (2006). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family/school partnerships.New York: The New Press.
10.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.EberL.PhillipsD.LewandowskiC. A. (2003). Illinois positive behavioral interventions and supports project: 2002–2003 progress report.Chicago: ISBE EBD/PBIS Network.
11.
KeenanS. (2004). Family and professional partnerships within a system of care: Exploring the role of families in pre-service and in-service development and training.Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health.
12.
KeithT. Z.KeithP. B.TroutmanG. C.BickleyP. G.TrivetteP. S.SinghK. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade students' achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474–496.
13.
LeistynaL. (2002). Extending the possibilities of multicultural community partnerships in urban public schools. The Urban Review, 34(1), 1–23.
14.
MannE.MuscottH. S. (2004). The family engagement checklist.Bedford, NH: New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
15.
MuscottH. S. (2002). Exceptional partnerships: Listening to the voices of families. Preventing School Failure, 46, 66–69.
16.
MuscottH. S.MannE.BenjaminT. B.GatelyS.BellK.MuscottA. J. (2004). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire: Preliminary results of a statewide system for implementing schoolwide discipline practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 27, 453–475.
17.
MuscottH. S.MannE.LeBrunM. (in press). Positive behavioral interventions and supports in New Hampshire: Effects of large-scale implementation of schoolwide positive behavior support on student discipline and academic achievement. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions.
18.
National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, and the National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2002). Mental health, schools and families working together for all children and youth: A shared agenda.Alexandria, VA: Author.
19.
New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Intervention and Supports. (2008). PBIS-NH: 2006–2007 report to the NH DOE.Bedford, NH: Author.
20.
New Hampshire Family Engagement Work Group. (2004). Family-friendly schools.Bedford, NH: New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
21.
NogeraP. (1999). Transforming urban schools through investments in the social capital of parents. Motion Magazine. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from www.inmotionmagazine.com/pncap1.html.
SheldonS. (2003). Linking school-family-community partnerships in urban elementary schools to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 25(2), 149–165.
24.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (1999). Discipline and behavioral support: Preferred processes and practices. Effective School Practices, 17, 10–22.
25.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–259.
26.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Act.Washington, DC: Author.