CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R.WalkerD.KaminskiR.GoodR.McConnellS.McEvoyM. (2002). Individual growth and development indicators (IGDIs): Assessment that guides intervention for young children. In OstroskyM.HornE. (Eds.). Assessment: Gathering meaningful information. The Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series #4. Longmont, CO: Sopris West. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.igdi.ku.edu/documents/index.htm.
2.
DenoS. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1–17). New York: Guilford.
3.
Dynamic Measurement Group. (2007). “Steps in the outcomes-driven model.”Eugene, OR: Author.
4.
FuchsL. S. (1988). Effects of computer-managed instruction on teachers' implementation of systematic monitoring programs, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 294–304.
5.
FuchsL. S. (1989). Evaluating solutions: Monitoring progress and revising intervention plans. In ShinnM. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 153–181). New York: Guilford.
6.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
7.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
8.
HellerK. A.HoltzmanW.MessickS. (1982). Placement in special education: Historical developments and current procedures. In HellerK. A.HoltzmanW. H.MessickS. (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity (pp. 23–44). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
HowellK. W.NoletV. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Canada: Wadsworth.
10.
Individuals With Disabilities Act of 1997. Reauthorization of P.L. 105–17.
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P. L. 108–466.
12.
KaminskiR. A.CummingsK. D. (2007, Winter). Assessment for learning: Using general outcomes measures. Threshold, 26–28.
13.
KaminskiR. A.CummingsK. D.Powell-SmithK. A.GoodR. H. (2008). Best practices in using dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS®) for formative assessment and evaluation. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 1181–1204). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
14.
KaminskiR. A.GoodR. H. (1998). Assessing early literacy skills in a problem-solving model: Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Advanced applications of CBM (pp. 113–142). New York: Guilford.
15.
KavaleK. (2005). Effective intervention for students with specific learning disability: The nature of special education. Learning Disabilities, 13 (4), 127–138.
16.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to Intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
17.
National Research Council. (2002). Executive summary. Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P. L. 107–110.
19.
PasternackR. H. (2002, March). The demise of IQ testing for children with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists 2002 Annual Convention, Chicago, IL.
20.
President's Council on Special Education Excellence. (2002). A NEW ERA: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
21.
ShinnM. R. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology III (pp. 547–567). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
22.
ShinnM. R. (2002). Best Practices in using curriculum based measurement in a problem-solving model. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 671–697). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. Retrieved January 8, 2008, from http://www.nasponline.org/trainers/BPIV/44-Shinn.pdf.
23.
SimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J.GoodR. H.HarnB. A.ColeC.BraunD. (2002). Building, implementing, and sustaining a beginning reading improvement model: Lessons learned school by school. In ShinnM. R.WalkerH. M.StonerG. (Eds.). Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 537–570). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
24.
TillyW. D. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 17–36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
YsseldykeJ.MarstonD. (1998). Origins of categorical special education services in schools and a rationale for changing them. In ReschlyD. J.TillyW. D.IIIGrimesJ. P. (Eds.). Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 1–18). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.