BakerE. T.WangM. C.WalbergH. J. (1995). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33–35.
2.
Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
3.
BrookhartS. M. (1991). Grading practices and validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(1), 35–36.
4.
BrookhartS. M. (1993). Teachers' grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(2), 123–142.
5.
BursuckW.PollowayE. A.PlanteL.EpsteinM. H.JayanthiM.McConeghyJ. (1996). Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices. Exceptional Children, 62, 301–318.
6.
BursuckW. D.MunkD. D.OlsonM. M. (1999). The fairness of report card grading adaptations: What do students with and without disabilities think?. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 84–92.
7.
CarlbergC.KavaleK. A. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 296–309.
8.
CizekG. J.FitzgeraldS. M.RachorR. E. (1996). Teachers' assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 159–179.
9.
DonahueK.ZigmondN. (1990). Academic grades of ninth-grade urban learning disabled students and low-achieving peers. Exceptionality, 1(1), 17–27.
10.
EtscheidtS. K. (2006). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP teams. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 56–60.
11.
FraryR. B.CrossL. H.WeberL. J. (1993). Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 23–30.
12.
FreedmanM. K. (2005). Student testing and the law: The requirements educators, parents, and officials should know. Horsham, PA: LRP Publications.
13.
FriedmanS. J.FrisbieD. A. (1995). The influence of report cards on the validity of grades reported to parents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(1), 5–26.
14.
GuskeyT. R. (1994). Making the grade: What benefits students. Educational Leadership, 52(2), 14–20.
15.
GuskeyT. R. (1996). Reporting on student learning: Lessons from the past—Prescriptions for the future. In GuskeyT. R. (Ed.), Communicating student learning: 1996 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 13–24). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
GuskeyT. R. (2001). Helping standards make the grade. Educational Leadership, 59(1), 20–27.
17.
GuskeyT. R. (2006). Making high school grades meaningful. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9), 670–675.
18.
GuskeyT. R.JungL. A. (2006, Winter). The challenges of standards-based grading. Leadership Compass, 4(2), 6–10.
19.
HandlerB. R. (2003, April). Special education practices: An evaluation of educational environmental placement trends since the regular education initiative. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
20.
HuntP.Farron-DavisF.BecksteadS.CurtisD.GoetzL. (1994). Evaluating the effects of placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 200–214.
21.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C § 1400 to 1491 (1997).
22.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C § 1400 to 1482 (2004).
23.
McMillanJ. H.MyranS.WorkmanD. (2002). Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices. Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 203–213.
PollowayE. A.EpsteinM. H.BursuckW. D.RoderiqueT. W.McConeghyJ. L.JayanthiM. (1994). Classroom grading: A national survey of policies. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 162–170.
26.
RingM. M.ReetzL. (2000). Modification effects on attribution of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 34–42.
27.
SilvaM.MunkD. D.BursuckW. D. (2005). Grading adaptations for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 87–98.
28.
StigginsR. J. (2001). Report cards. In Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.; pp. 409–465). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
29.
ThurlowM. L. (2002). Positive educational results for all students: The promise of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 195–202.
30.
TruogA. L.FriedmanS. J. (April, 1996). Evaluating high school teachers' written grading policies from a measurement perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
31.
WaldronN. L. (1998). The effects of an inclusive school program on students with mild and severe learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 395–405.
32.
WigginsG. (1996). Honesty and fairness: Toward better grading and reporting. In GuskeyT. R. (Ed.), Communicating student learning: 1996 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 141–176). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.