AshbakerB. Y.MorganJ. (2006). Paraprofessionals in the classroom. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
2.
BlachmanB. A.BallE.BlackR.TangelD. (1994). Kindergarten teachers develop phoneme awareness in low-income, inner-city classrooms: Does it make a difference?. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–17.
3.
BroerS. M.DoyleM. B.GiangrecoM. F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71, 415–430.
4.
Causton-TheoharisJ. N.MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Building bridges: Strategies to help paraprofessionals promote peer interactions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 37(6), 18–24.
5.
DoyleM. B. (2002). The Paraprofessionals Guide to the Inclusive Classroom: Working as a Team (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
DoyleM. B.LeeP. A. (2007). Creating partnerships with paraprofessionals. In GiangrecoM. F.DoyleM. B. (Eds.), Quick-guides to inclusion: Ideas for education students with disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 267–280). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
ErlbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM.MoodyS. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619.
8.
FoormanB. R.FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.SchatschneiderC.MehtaP. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55.
9.
FrenchN. K. (1998). Working together: Resource teachers and paraeducators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 61–73.
10.
GerberS. B.FinnJ. D.AchillesC. M.Boyd-ZahariasJ. (2001). Teacher aides and students' academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123–143.
11.
GiangrecoM. F. (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 50–53.
12.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
13.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M.EdelmanS. W. (1999). The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 281–291.
14.
GiangrecoM. F.DoyleM. B. (2004). Directing paraprofessional work. In KennedyC.HornE. (Eds.), Including students with severe disabilities (pp. 185–204). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgment of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 485–498.
16.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M. (2003). School wide planning to improve paraeducator supports. Exceptional Children, 70, 63–79.
17.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS.LuiselliT. E.MacFarlandS. Z. C. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
18.
GunnB.SmolkowskiK.BiglanA.BlackC. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 69–79.
19.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
20.
JenkinsJ. R.VadasyP. F.FirebaughM.ProfiletC. (2000). Tutoring first-grade struggling readers in phonological reading skills. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 75–84.
21.
LaneK. L.FletcherT.CarterE.DejudDeLorenzoJ. (in press). Paraprofessionalled phonological awareness training with youngsters at-risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education.
22.
MalmgrenK. W.Causton-TheoharisJ. N. (2006). Boy in the bubble: Effects of paraprofessional proximity and other pedagogical decisions on the interactions of a student with behavior disorders. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20, 301–312.
23.
ManningD. (1979). The reading and math achievement of remedial middle school students taught by teachers versus paraprofessionals. Reading Improvement, 16(1), 35–42.
24.
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings; helping, hovering, or holding their own?. Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
25.
MillerS. D. (2003). Partners-in-reading: Using classroom assistants to provide tutorial assistance to struggling first-grade readers. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 8, 333–349.
26.
PickettA. L.GerlachK. (2003). Supervising paraeducators in school settings: A team approach (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
27.
SimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J.StoolmillerM.CoyneM. D.HarnB. (2003). Accelerating growth and maintaining proficiency: A two-year intervention study of kindergarten and first-grade children at risk for reading difficulties. In FoormanB. R. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 197–228). Timonium, MD: York Press.
28.
TorgesenJ. K.AlexanderA. W.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.VoellerK.ConwayT.RoseE. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading difficulties: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–59.
29.
TorgesenJ. K.BryantB. R. (1994). Phonological Awareness Training for Reading [PATR]. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
30.
VadasyP. F.JenkinsJ. R.PoolK. (2000). Effects of tutoring in phonological and early reading skills on students at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 579–590.
31.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A.JenkinsJ. R. (2002). Timing and intensity of tutoring: A closer look at the conditions for effective early literacy tutoring. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 17, 227–241.
32.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2006a). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508–528.
33.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2006b). Paraeducator-supplemented instruction in structural analysis with text reading practice for second and third graders at risk for reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 227–241.
34.
VaughnS.ColemanM. (2004) The role of mentoring in promoting use of research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 25–38.