BransfordJ. C.DelclosJ. R.VyeN. J.BurnsM.HasselbringT. S. (1987). State of the art and future directions. In LidzC. S. (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 479–496). New York: Guilford Press.
2.
BudoffM.GimonA.CormanL. (1974). Learning potential measurement with Spanish-speaking youth as an alternative to IQ tests: A first report. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 8, 233–246.
3.
BudoffM.MeskinJ.HarrisonR. H. (1971). Educational test of the learning-potential hypothesis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 76, 159–169.
4.
CaffreyE.FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (in press). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment: A review. Journal of Special Education.
5.
CampioneJ. C.BrownA. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In LidzC. S. (Ed.), Dynamic testing (pp. 82–115). New York: Guilford Press.
6.
CampioneJ. C.BrownA. L.FerraraR. A.JonesR. S.SteinbergE. (1985). Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9, 297–315.
7.
CarlsonJ. S.WiedelK. H. (1978). Use of testing-the-limits procedures in the testing of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 11, 559–564.
8.
CarlsonJ. S.WiedelK. H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing-the-limits employing the Raven matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323–344.
9.
FeuersteinR.RandY.HoffmanM. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device. Baltimore: University Park Press.
10.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2005). Dynamic assessment for young at-risk readers. Unpublished test. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
11.
GrigorenkoE. L.SternbergR. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111.
12.
JastakS.WilkinsonG. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test—Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
13.
LidzC. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.
14.
SpectorJ. E. (1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 353–363.
15.
SwansonH. L. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71, 321–363.
16.
WechslerD. (1999). Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
17.
WoodcockR. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
YellM. L.ShrinerJ. G.KatsiyannisA. (2006). Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 and IDEA Regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39(1), 1–24.