DenoS. L.FuchsL. S.MarstonD.ShinJ. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 507–524.
2.
DentonC. A.VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2003). Bringing research-based practices in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201–211.
3.
ElbaumB.VaughnS.HughesM. T.MoodyS. W. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 605–619.
4.
FoormanB. (Ed.). (2003). Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
5.
FuchsL. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 18(3), 172–186.
GerberM. (2005). Teachers are still the test: Limitations of Response to Instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 516–524.
8.
GravesM.JuelC.GravesB. (2001). Teaching reading in the 21st century. Des Moines, IA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
JenkinsJ. R.O'ConnorR. E. (2002). Early identification and intervention for young children with reading/learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 99–149). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
KampsD. M.GreenwoodC. R. (2005). Formulating secondary-level reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 500–509.
11.
MarstonD.MirkinP. K.DenoS. L. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification. Journal of Special Education, 19, 109–118.
12.
MastropieriM. A.ScruggsT. E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities: 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18(4), 197–214.
13.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 004769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14.
PressleyM. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.
15.
ReschlyD. (2005). Learning disabilities: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 510–515.
16.
SnowC.BurnsS.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
17.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S. (2000). Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 128–134.
18.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129–140.
19.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 277–321.
20.
TorgesenJ. K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.
21.
Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts at The University of Texas at Austin. (2005). Implementing the 3-tier reading model: Reducing reading difficulties for kindergarten through third grade students (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Author.
22.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD. J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67(1), 99–114.
23.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In FoormanB. (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275–298). Parkton, MD: York Press.
24.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS. (2004). Research-based methods of reading instruction: Grades K-3. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
26.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.MathesP. G.CirinoP. T.CarlsonC. D.Pollard-DurodolaS. D. (2006). Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 56–73.
27.
VaughnS.MathesP. G.Linan-ThompsonS.CirinoP. T.CarlsonC. D.Pollard-DurodolaS. D. (2006). First-grade English language learners at-risk for reading problems: Effectiveness of an English intervention. Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 153–180.