ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.BryantJ. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention: A two-year longitudinal study of decision rules and procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 394–409.
2.
ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (submitted). The course of reading and mathematics development in first grade: Identifying latent trajectories and early predictors. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.DavisG. C. (in press). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal study at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
4.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
5.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13(4), 204–219.
6.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness-to-intervention. Exceptional Children, 73, 311–330.
7.
GoodR. H.IIISimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 257–288.
8.
TorgesenJ. K.AlexanderA. W.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.VoellerK. K. S.ConwayT. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58.
9.
VaughnS. R.FuchsL. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to treatment: Rationale and assumptions. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137–146.
10.
VellutinoF.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic cause of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
