CASL National Center on Accelerated Student Learning. (n.d.) POW+WWW, What=2, How=2, Retrieved June 1, 2006 from www.kc.vanderbilt.edu/casl/powwww2.pdf.
2.
ChalkJ.Hagan-BurkeS.BurkeM. (2005). The effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development on the writing process for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 75–87.
3.
DanoffB.HarrisK.GrahamS. (1993). Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on the writing of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(3), 295–322.
4.
DicksonS. V.CollinsV. L.SimmonsD. C.Kame'enuiE. J. (1998). Metacognitive strategies: Instruction and curricular basics and implications. In SimmonsD.Kame'enuiE. (Eds.) What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs (pp. 361–380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
GrahamS.HarrisK. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
6.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 353–361.
7.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MacArthurC. (2006). Explicitly teaching struggling writers: Strategies for mastering the writing process. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(5), 290–294.
8.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MasonL. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 207–241.
9.
HarrisK.GrahamS.MasonL. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling young writers: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–340.
10.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
11.
LienemannT.ReidR. (2006). Self-Regulated Strategy Development for students with learning disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(1), 3–11.
12.
MasonL.HarrisK.GrahamS. (2002). Every child has a story to tell: Self-regulated strategy development for story writing. Education & Treatment of Children. 25(4), 496–506.
13.
MasonL.HarrisK.GrahamS. (2004). POW + WWW, What=2, How=2 equals fun and exciting stories. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 36(6), 70–73.
14.
SaddlerB.MoranS.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Exceptionality, 12, 13–17.
15.
SawyerR.GrahamS.HarrisK. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340–352.
16.
WongB. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(2), 110–119.