AgranM.King-SearsM.WehmeyerM.CopelandS. (2003). Teachers' guides to inclusive practices: Student-directed learning. Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
2.
ArriesJ. (1999). Learning disabilities and foreign languages: A curriculum approach to the design of inclusive courses. Modern Foreign Languages Journal, 83(1), 98–110.
3.
ClaytonJ.BurdgeM.DenhamA.KleinertH.KearnsJ. (2006). A four-step process for accessing the general curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(5), 20–27.
CollinsB.KleinertH.LandL. (2006). Addressing math standards and functional math. In BrowderD.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching reading, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 197–227). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
6.
CurtainH.DahlbergC. A. (2004). Languages and children: Making the match (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
7.
DeshlerD.SchumakerJ.BulgrenJ.LenzB.JantzenJ.AdamsG. (2001). Making learning easier: Connecting new knowledge to things students already know. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(4), 82–85.
8.
DowneyD.SnyderL. (2001). Curricular accommodations for college students with language learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 21(2), 55–67.
9.
DuvallE. (2006). Including students with disabilities in a foreign language class. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(6), 42–47.
10.
Education Commission of the States (2006). High school graduation requirements: Foreign language. Denver, CO: Author. Retrieved April 11, 2006, from http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=905.
HewardW. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
13.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 105–17, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
14.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 108–446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
15.
KaiserA.GrimJ. (2006). Teaching functional communication skills. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed.; pp. 447–488). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
16.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat.1425, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.
17.
SparksR.GanschowL. (1993). The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 77, 58–74.
18.
SpoonerF.BrowderD. (2006). Why teach the general curriculum. In BrowderD.SpoonerF. (Eds.), Teaching reading, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities (pp. 1–13). Baltimore: Paul Brookes.
19.
Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century (1999). Yonkers, NY: National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project.
20.
UbertiH.ScruggsT.MastropieriM. (2003). Keywords make the difference: Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 56–61.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved on July 14, 2006, from http://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/str6_completereport.pdf.