AllsoppD. H.KygerM.LovinL. (2006). Teaching algebraic thinking. In HudsonP.MillerS. P. (Eds.), Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs (pp. 432–488). Boston: Pearson Education.
2.
BaxterJ.WoodwardJ.VoorhiesJ.WongJ. (2002). We talk about it, but do they get it?. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 173–185.
3.
BaxterJ. A.WoodwardJ.OlsonD. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction in five third grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529–548.
4.
BaxterJ. A.WoodwardJ.OlsonD. (2005). Writing in mathematics: An alternative form of communication for academically low-achieving students. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(2), 119–135.
5.
BielenbergB.FillmoreL. W. (2004/2005). The English they need for the test. Educational Leadership, 62(4), 45–49.
6.
BleyN. S.ThorntonC. A. (1995). Teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
7.
BottgeB. A.HasselbringT. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556–566.
8.
BottgeB. A.HeinrichsM.ChanS.SerlinR. C. (2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem-solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 299–314.
9.
ButlerD. L.BeckinghamB.LauscherH. J. N. (2005). Promoting strategic learning by eighth-grade students struggling in mathematics: A report of three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 156–174.
10.
ButlerF. M.MillerS. P.CrehanK.BabbittB.PierceT. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice18, 99–111.
11.
CassM.CatesD.SmithM.JacksonC. (2003). Effects of manipulative instruction on solving area and perimeter problems by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 112–120.
12.
CathcartW. G.PothierY. M.VanceJ. H.BezukN. S. (2000). Learning mathematics in elementary and middle schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
13.
ChazanD.BallD. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
14.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper Series and assessment data. Educational Psychologist27(4), 291–315.
15.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). The Jasper experiment: Using video to furnish real-world problem-solving contexts. Arithmetic Teacher40, 474–478.
16.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.AppletonA. C. (2002). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on the mathematical problem-solving performance of students with mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 90–106.
18.
GagnonJ. C.MacCiniP. (2001). Preparing students with disabilities for algebra. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34(1), 8–15.
19.
GoldmanS. R.HasselbringT. S., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 198–208.
20.
GreenwoodC. R.Arreaga-MayerC.CartaJ. J. (1994). Identification and translation of effective teacher-developed instructional procedures for general practice. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 140–151.
21.
HarrisC. A.MillerS. P.MercerC. D. (1995). Teaching initial multiplication skills to students with disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 180–195.
22.
HudsonP. J. (1996). Using a learning set to increase the test performance of students with learning disabilities in social studies classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 78–85.
23.
HudsonP. J.MillerS. P. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Boston: Pearson Education.
24.
Kame'enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25.
KamiiC.ClarkF. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 116–121.
26.
KooyT.SkokR. L.McLaughlinT. F. (1992). The effect of graphic advance organizers on the math and science comprehension with high school special education students. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 16, 101–111.
27.
KozmaR.SchankP. (1998). Connecting with the 21st century: Technology in support of educational reform. In DedeC. (Ed.), ASCD year book 1998 learning with technology (pp. 3–27). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28.
LenzB. K.EllisE. S.ScanlonD. (1996). Teaching learning strategies to adolescents and adults with learning disabilities. Austin: PRO-ED.
29.
MathewsD. M.PracekE.OlsonJ. (2000). Technology for teaching and learning. In OlsonJ. L.PlattJ. M. (Eds.), Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (3rd ed.; pp. 322–346). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
30.
MercerC. D.MillerS. P. (1991–1994). Strategic math series. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
31.
MercerC. D.MillerS. P. (1994). Multiplication facts 0 to 81. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
32.
MillerS. P.ButlerF.LeeK. (1998). Validated practices for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities: A review of literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31(1), 1–24.
33.
MontagueM. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164–177.
34.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35.
RiveraD. P. (1996). Effective mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: Introduction to the two-part series. LD Forum, 21(2), 4–9.
36.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 129–140.
37.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). A synthesis of experimental intervention literature for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 271–321.
38.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (2001). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: A component and composite analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 109–119.
39.
TuckerB. F.SingletonA. H.WeaverT. L. (2002). Teaching mathematics to all children. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
40.
WilliamsH. (2006). Math in the grammar classroom. ELT Journal, 60(1), 23–33.
41.
Williams, S. M., Burgess, K. L., Bray, M. H., Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Technology and learning in schools for thought classrooms. In DedeC. (Ed.), ASCD year book 1998 learning with technology (pp. 97–119). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.