AgranM.AlperS.WehmeyerM. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(2), 123–133.
2.
BrowderD.SpoonerF. (2006). Teaching language arts, math and science to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC.KarvonenM.AlgozzineR. (2004). A content analysis of the curricular philosophies reflected in states' alternate assessment performance indicators. Research and Practice in Severe Disabilities, 28, 165–181.
BurdgeM.GroneckV.KleinertH.Wildman-LongwillA.ClaytonJ.DenhamA. (2001). Integrating alternate assessment into the general curriculum. In KleinertH.KearnsJ., (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 49–75). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
DenhamA. (2004). Pathways to learning for students with cognitive challenges: Reading, writing and presenting. Retrieved June 19, 2005 from University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/IEI.
7.
FlowersC.BrowderD.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF. (2005). Teachers' perceptions of alternate assessments. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(2), 81–92.
JacksonL.RyndakD.BillingsleyF. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate to severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25, 129–141.
16.
KleinertH.KearnsJ. (2004). Alternate assessments. In OreloveF.SobseyD., & SilbermanR. (Eds.), Educating children with multiple disabilities: A collaborative approach (4th ed.; pp. 115–149). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
17.
KleinertH.ThurlowM. (2001). An introduction to alternate assessment. In KleinertH.KearnsJ. (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 1–15). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
18.
Mayer-Johnson Co. (1998) Boardmaker for Windows (Version 5.0) [computer software]. Solana Beach, CA: Author.
19.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No.107–110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
20.
ThompsonS.ThurlowM.EslerA.WhetstoneP. (2001). Addressing standards and assessments on the IEP. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26(2), 77–84.
21.
U.S. Department of Education. Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged, 66 Fed. Reg. 68698-68708 (December 9, 2003).
22.
WehmeyerM.L. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Providing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
WestlingD.FoxL. (2004). Teaching students with severe disabilities (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
24.
Widgit Software Ltd. (2002). Writing with Symbols 2000 (Version 2.5). [Computer software]. Cambridge, CB4 0ZS, UK Widget Software Ltd.
25.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26.
ZabalaJ. S. (1996). SETTing the stage for success: Building success through effective selection and use of assistive technology systems. Retrieved April 4, 2005, from http://sweb.uky.edu/∼jszaba0/SETT.