The No Child Left behind Act,Adequate Yearly Progress,and Students with Disabilities

Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Implications for special education policy and practice. PDF available at http://www.cec.sped.org/pp/NCLBside-by-side.pdf.Author.

Deno S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36(2), 5–10.

Deno S. L. , (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965, 20 U.S.C. § 16301 et seq.

Elliott J. L. Thurlow M. L. (2003). Improving test performance of students with disabilities … on district and state assessments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Fuchs L. A. Fuchs D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.

Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, 20 U.S.C. § 16301 et seq.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

McCombs J. Kirby S. N. Barney H. Darilek S. Magee S. J. (2004). Achieving state and national literacy goals, a long uphill road. New York; Rand Corporation for the Carnegie Foundation.

The National Center on Progress Monitoring (2005). Common questions for progress monitoring. Retrieved October 24, 2005 from http://www.studentprogress.org/progresmon.asp.

No Child Left Behind, 20 U.S.C. § 16301 et seq.

No Child Left Behind Regulations, Federal Register, Volume 67 Number 321, Pages 71709–71771, December 2, 2002.

O'Neill P. T. (2004). No Child Left Behind compliance manual. New York: Brownstone.

Paige R. (2001, October). Testimony of Secretary Paige before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Retrieved April 24, 2002, from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2001/10/011004.html.

Pasternak R. (2002, March). Testimony of Assistant Secretary Pasternak before the Senate Committee on health, Education, labor, and pensions. Retrieved April 24, 2002 from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2002/03/20020321.htm.

Spellings M. (2005, May 10). Press release: Spellings announces new special education guidelines, details workable, “commonsense” policy to help states implement No Child Left Behind. Retrieved July 8, 2004 from www.ed.gov/news/pressrelease/2005/05/05102005.html.

State plans contain specific data for exceptions to 1 percent cap. (2004). The Special Educator, 19(19), 6.

Thurlow M. L. Elliott J. L. Ysseldyke J. E. (2001). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Title I–Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged; Final Rule, 68 Fed. Reg. 68689-68708 (Dec. 9, 2003) (to be codified at 48 C.F.R. pt. 200).

U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Lead and manage my school: Letter to Chief State School Officers regarding inclusion of students with disabilities in state accountability systems. Retrieved November 15, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/csso030204.html.

U.S. House of Representatives. (2003). Congressional Report of the Reauthorization of the IDEA. Retrieved November, 16, 2005 from edworkforce.house.gov/issues/108th/education/idea/conferencereport/confrept.htm.

Wright P. D. Wright P. D. Heath S. W. (2004). No Child Left Behind. Hartfield, VA: Harbor House Law Press.

Yell M. L. Drasgow E. (2005). No Child Left Behind: A guide for professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice-Hall.

Yell M. L. Drasgow E. Lowrey K. A. (2005). No Child Left Behind and students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 130–139.