AksamitD.LeuenbergerJ.MorrisM. (1987). Preparation of student services professionals and faculty for serving learning-disabled college students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 53–59.
2.
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 42 U.S.C. §12101. Federal Register, 56(44), 35544–35756.
3.
ArnoldE. (1998). Can I make it work?Rochester, NY: Arncraft.
4.
Bakke v. Regents of University of California, 18 Cal. 3d 342, 553 (1976).
5.
Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, James T. Fuller—New York State Board of Law Examiners, John E. Holt-Harris, Jr., Richard J. Bartlett—New York State Board of Law Examiners, Laura Taylor Swain, Charles T. Beeching, Jr., and Ira P. Sloane, individually and as members of New York State Board of Law Examiners, No. 97–9162, 156 F 3d. 321, 1998 U.S. Appellate LEXIS 22361, 1–28.
6.
BurgstahlerS.DuclosR.TurcotteM. (2000). Preliminary findings: Faculty, teaching assistant, and student perceptions regarding accommodating students with disabilities in postsecondary environments. Seattle, WA: Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology at the University of Washington.
7.
BurnsJ. P.ArmisteadL. P.KeysR. C. (1990). Developing a transition initiative program for students with handicapping conditions. Community/Junior College, 14, 319–329.
8.
DunnC. (1996). A status report on transition planning for individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(1), 17–30.
9.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
10.
Grove City College v. Bell, Secretary of Education, Supreme Court of the United States, 465 U.S. 555 (1984).
11.
Guckenberger et al. v. Boston University, Jon Westling, Craig Klafter, No. 96-C.V.-11426-PBS, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8469, 1–11.
12.
HEATH. (1999). Facts you can use: Basic of exit from high school special education for students with disabilities, ages 17–21. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, HEATH Resource Center.
13.
HeywardS. (1998). Disability and higher education: Guidance for Section 504 and ADA compliance. Horsham, PA: LRP.
14.
HornL.BerktoldJ. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes (NCES 1999–187). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
15.
KincaidJ. (1997). IDEA revisions may have “ripple effect” on college transition. Disability Compliance for Higher Education, 3, 1–6.
16.
LehmannJ. P.DaviesT. G.LaurinK. (2000). Listening to student voices about postsecondary education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 32(5), 60–65.
17.
LeyserY.VogelS.WylandS.BrulleA. R. (1998). Faculty attitudes and practices regarding students with disabilities: Two decades after implementation of Section 504. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13(3), 5–19.
18.
LockR. H.LaytonC. A. (2001). Succeeding in postsecondary education through self-advocacy. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34(2), 66–71.
19.
Maczaczyj v. State of New York and Anne Berholf, individually and as the Center Director—Associate Dean of Empire State College of the State University of New York, State of New York, No. 96-CV-0823C(F), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, 1–9.
20.
MalcolmS. M.MatyasM. L. (Eds.). (1991). Investing in human potential: Science and engineering at the crossroads. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
21.
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Case Western Reserve University, No. 88-CV-66721 WL 716543, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, 1–15.
22.
Pell v. Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York Barnard College Columbia University, Christina Bickford, Sergio Castilla, Annette Insdorf, & James Schamus, No. 97 CIV. 0193 (SS), 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 407, 1–25.
23.
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93–112, 29 U.S.C. §793, 34 C.F.R. §104.3(k)(3).
24.
Smith v. University of the State of New York, State University of New York, George Bobinski, SUNY, Kathryn Galvin, SUNY, Elizabeth Gilbert, SUNY, New York State Department of Education, Board of Education of the Hornell City School District and Susan Gray, No. 95-CV-0477E(H), 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20782, 1–7.
25.
Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397, 99 S. Ct. 2361, 60 L.Ed.2d 980 (1979).
26.
StoddenR. A.WhelleyT. (2004). Postsecondary education and persons with intellectual disabilities: An introduction. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(1), 6–15.
27.
WeeksK. M. (1997). Academic accommodations and disabled students. Lex Collegii, 20(4), 1–4.
28.
Wynne v. Tufts University School of Medicine, 932 F.2d 19 (1st Cir. 1991), modified 976 F.2d 791 (1st Cir. 1992). U.S. Appellate LEXIS 24933, 1–19.
29.
Zuckle v. Regents of the University of California, 97-16708166 F, 1999 U.S. Appellate LEXIS 2702, 1–14.