CardilloJ. E. (1994). Goal setting, follow-up, and goal monitoring. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.), Goal Attainment Scaling: Application, Theory, and Measurement (pp. 39–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
CardilloJ. E.SmithA. (1994). Psychometric issues. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.), Goal Attainment Scaling: Application, Theory, and Measurement (pp. 173–212). Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum.
3.
CarrR. A. (1979). Goal attainment scaling as a useful tool for evaluating progress in special education. Exceptional Children, 46, 88–95.
4.
DiPernaJ. C.ElliottS. N. (2000). Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
5.
DiPernaJ. C.ElliottS. N. (2002). Promoting academic enablers to improve student achievement: An introduction to the miniseries. School Psychology Review, 31, 293–297.
6.
DiPernaJ. C.VolpeR. J.ElliottS. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31, 298–312.
7.
ElliottS. N.DiPernaJ. C.ShapiroE. S. (2001). Academic Intervention Monitoring System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
8.
ElliottS. N.SladeczekI.KratochwillT. R. (1995, August). Goal attainment scaling: Its use as a progress monitoring and outcome effectiveness measure in behavioral consultation. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, N Y.
9.
FoegenA.EspinC. A.AllinderR. M.MarkellM. A. (2001). Translating research into practice: Preservice teachers' beliefs about curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Special Education, 34, 226–237.
10.
FuchsL. S. (2002). Best practices in defining student goals and outcomes. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-IV (pp. 539–546). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
11.
FuchsL. S.ElliottS. N. (1997). The utility of curriculum-based measurement and performance assessment as alternatives to traditional intelligence and achievement tests. School Psychology Review, 26, 224–233.
12.
KiresukT. J. (1994). Historical perspective. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.), Goal Attainment Scaling: Application, Theory, and Measurement (pp. 135–160). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
KiresukT. J.ShermanR. E. (1968). Goal attainment scaling: A general method for evaluating community mental health programs. Community Mental Health Journal, 4, 443–453.
14.
KratochwillT. R.ElliottS. N.RottoP. C. (1995). Best practices in school-based behavioral consultation. In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology-III (pp. 519–538). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
15.
MaherC. A. (1982). Learning disabled adolescents in the regular classroom: Evaluation of a mainstreaming procedure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 82–84.
16.
MaherC. A. (1983). Goal attainment scaling: A method for evaluating special education services. Exceptional Children, 49, 529–536.
17.
MaleckiC. M.ElliottS. N. (2002). Children's social behaviors as predictors of academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 1–23.
18.
MitchellT.CusickA. (1998). Evaluation of a client-centered paediatric rehabilitation programme using goal attainment scaling. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 45, 7–17.
19.
OrenT.OgletreeB. T. (2000). Program evaluation in classrooms for students with autism: Student outcomes and program processes. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 170–175.
20.
Robertson-MjaanesS. L. (1999). An evaluation of goal attainment scaling as an intervention monitoring and outcome evaluation technique. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
21.
Santa-BarbaraJ.WoodwardC. A.LevinS.StreinerD. L.GoodmanJ. T.EpsteinN. B. (1977). Interrelationships among outcome measures in the McMaster Family Therapy Study. Goal Attainment Review, 3, 47–58.
22.
ShapiroE. S.BrowderJ. L. (1990). Behavioral assessment: Applications for persons with mental retardation. In MatsonJ. L. (Ed.), Handbook of Behavior Modification with the Mentally Retarded (pp. 93–120). New York: Plenum Press.
23.
ShapiroE. S.KratochwillT. R. (2000). Conducting School-Based Assessments of Child and Adolescent Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
24.
SherowS. M. (2000). Adult and family literacy adaptations of goal attainment scaling. Adult Basic Education, 10, 30–38.
25.
SladeczekI. E.ElliottS. N.KratochwillT. R.Robertson-MjaanesS.StoiberK. C. (2001). Application of goal attainment scaling to a conjoint behavioral consultation case. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 45–58.
26.
SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (1994). Perspectives on validity. In KiresukT. J.SmithA.CardilloJ. E. (Eds.). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
WilsonM. S.ReschlyD. J. (1996). Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9–23.
28.
WentzelK. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364.
29.
WoodwardC. A.Santa-BarbaraJ.StreinerD. L.GoodmanJ. T.LevinS.EpsteinN. B. (1981). Client, treatment, and therapist variables related to outcome in brief, systems-oriented family therapy. Family Process, 20, 189–197.